In this contemporary era, Public transport plays a imperative role in reducing the traffic congestion. Therefore a considerable amount of masses opines a large funds should be allocated to build latest railway lines so that trains can commute between the towns at a exponential pace, whilst some argue it should be utilized to improve current public transport. I shall examine both views before establishing my opinion.
To embark on, Trains cause minimal environmental degradation compared to road casualties. In other words, most of the trains usually commute in the countryside which results in less pollution and congestion in cities. Secondly, accidents in railway causalities are very rare. Besides this, most of the people feel safe commuting in the train due to safety and reliability. For instance, a recent toll conducted by researchers state, there has been a shift of 38% from roadways to railway due to fast and secure transportation. Thus it is clear why most of the individuals opinions allocating funds to construct new railway lines.
On a contrary, proponents of the above argument state spending money on railway is problematic as most of them commute within the city. In fact, construction of new flyovers and expanding roads can help in a better way. Also, this reduces traffic congestion and can make a way for the public to commute conveniently. Secondly, by providing more public buses and trams would help individual reach office and school at time. So few people opine this more fund to be allocated to boost public transport.
In conclusion, Although by improving existing transport can alleviate some problems, it fails to reduce the pollution which is threatening the environment. Thus I believe allocating immense funds for railway lines in cities would help solve most of the problem and would help society in a significant way.
In this contemporary era,
Public
transport plays
a
imperative role in reducing the traffic congestion.
Therefore
a considerable amount of masses opines a large
funds
should
be allocated
to build
latest
railway
lines
so
that
trains
can commute between the towns at
a
exponential pace, whilst
some
argue it should
be utilized
to
improve
current
public
transport. I shall examine both views
before
establishing my opinion.
To embark on,
Trains
cause minimal environmental degradation compared to road casualties.
In other words
, most of the
trains
usually
commute in the countryside which results in less pollution and congestion in cities.
Secondly
, accidents in
railway
causalities are
very
rare.
Besides
this, most of the
people
feel safe commuting in the
train
due to safety and reliability.
For instance
, a recent toll conducted by researchers state, there has been a shift of 38% from roadways to
railway
due to
fast
and secure transportation.
Thus
it is
clear
why most of the individuals opinions allocating funds to construct new
railway
lines.
On a contrary, proponents of the above argument state spending money on
railway
is problematic as most of them commute within the city. In fact, construction of new flyovers and expanding roads can
help
in a better way.
Also
, this
reduces
traffic congestion and can
make
a way for the
public
to commute
conveniently
.
Secondly
, by providing more
public
buses and trams would
help
individual reach office and school at time.
So
few
people
opine this more
fund
to
be allocated
to boost
public
transport.
In conclusion
, Although by improving existing transport can alleviate
some
problems, it fails to
reduce
the pollution which is threatening the environment.
Thus
I believe allocating immense funds for
railway
lines in cities would
help
solve most of the problem and would
help
society
in a significant way
.