Although it is sometimes thought that substantial amount of money ought to be spent to develop a new railway to provide high-speed transportation between cities, other people believe that the allocation should be utilized on enhancing current public transport. In my opinion, I consider that the money has to be used to upgrade the existing transport rather than building a new railway.
On the other hand, some people believe that money should be spent to increase the quality of public transport in providing better services and I agree. In other words, improving the public service allows more society to opted to utilize the service and as the result government income will be growth and the money can be used to build and improve other public services. For example, the typical problem for a railway is the delivery, which commonly delays for more than 15 minutes. Hence, increasing the speed of the arrival time will absolutely enhance the quality of public transport. Furthermore, improving public transport is vital to ensure the first transport for the people to choose is transport prepare by the government which directly able to reduce traffics overwhelmed.
Aside from that, it is often believed that it is better if the money allocated to develop a new railway line to deliver high-speed trains between cities. This to ensure the travel time is minimal for those people that travelling between cities. For instance, people who work in different cities able to arrive at their workplace on time. Without executing this project, people have to manage their time wisely in going to other cities. Another reason is that due to technology constraint as the old railway might not be able to sustain pressure produce by the train. Hence, building the new railway is an accurate action in assuring the safety of the passenger.
In conclusion, while many people may vary in their opinions, I think that is better to increase the existing public transport to maximize government income and fulfil people satisfaction in using public transport.
Although it is
sometimes
thought
that substantial amount of
money
ought to
be spent
to develop a
new
railway
to provide high-speed transportation between
cities
,
other
people
believe that the allocation should
be utilized
on enhancing
current
public
transport
. In my opinion, I consider that the
money
has to
be
used
to upgrade the existing
transport
rather
than building a
new
railway.
On the
other
hand,
some
people
believe that
money
should
be spent
to increase the quality of
public
transport
in providing better
services
and I
agree
. In
other
words, improving the
public
service
allows
more society to
opted
to utilize the
service
and as the result
government
income will be growth and the
money
can be
used
to build and
improve
other
public
services
.
For example
, the typical problem for a
railway
is the delivery, which
commonly
delays for more than 15 minutes.
Hence
, increasing the speed of the arrival
time
will
absolutely
enhance the quality of
public
transport
.
Furthermore
, improving
public
transport
is vital to ensure the
first
transport
for the
people
to choose is
transport
prepare by the
government
which
directly
able to
reduce
traffics overwhelmed.
Aside from that, it is
often
believed that it is better if the
money
allocated to develop a
new
railway
line to deliver high-speed trains between
cities
. This to ensure the travel
time
is minimal for those
people
that travelling between
cities
.
For instance
,
people
who work in
different
cities
able to arrive at their workplace on
time
. Without executing this project,
people
have to
manage their
time
wisely
in going to
other
cities
. Another reason is that due to technology constraint as the
old
railway
might not be able to sustain pressure produce by the train.
Hence
, building the
new
railway
is an accurate action in assuring the safety of the passenger.
In conclusion
, while
many
people
may vary in their opinions, I
think
that is
better to increase the existing
public
transport
to maximize
government
income and fulfil
people
satisfaction in using
public
transport
.