Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport v.27

People, in some countries, prefer to have a fast and extensive rail transportation system while others think that improving the existing road transportation system is far more important and that is why more budget should be spent on roads. This essay discusses both views. Personally, I am in favour of developing and enhancing both. On the one hand, people in favour of having a speedy and reliable train communication system mainly base their ground on the fact that trains can carry a large number of passengers and goods at a time and can remarkably reduce the traffic congestion. Rail communication is safer, faster and can connect cities and towns that build a better connection than the conventional road transport system, according to these people. Furthermore, locomotives are already famous in many countries and have greatly improved communications there. Due to such advantages, people often opine that more money should be allocated for constructing new fast train lines. For instance, the train system in China and Russia both have a groundbreaking contribution to improving its overall communication system and many countries have started adopting this model. On the other hand, public transport system plays an essential role in interconnecting the different parts of the cities and most people use this system to travel to different places. Though trains can improve the city transport facilities, it is not an alternative to the existing road transports. That is why many people believe that the national budget should be utilised on improving public transport for the sake of better communication for mass people. For instance, the train line in the UK has always contributed to a great extent to the overall transport system in the country. Nevertheless, public transport has always been the main commuting mode for UK citizens. To conclude, I believe that the national budget should be fairly distributed for the improvement of the fast and new rail system as well as public transports for the overall expansion and improvement of the transportation system in a country
People
, in
some
countries
, prefer to have a
fast
and extensive rail transportation
system
while others
think
that improving the existing
road
transportation
system
is far more
important
and
that is
why more budget should
be spent
on
roads
. This essay discusses both views.
Personally
, I am in
favour
of developing and enhancing both.

On the one hand,
people
in
favour
of having a speedy and reliable
train
communication
system
mainly
base their ground on the fact that
trains
can carry
a large number of
passengers and
goods
at a time and can
remarkably
reduce
the traffic congestion. Rail
communication
is safer, faster and can connect cities and towns that build a better connection than the conventional
road
transport
system
, according to these
people
.
Furthermore
, locomotives are already
famous
in
many
countries
and have
greatly
improved
communications there. Due to such advantages,
people
often
opine that more money should
be allocated
for constructing new
fast
train
lines.
For instance
, the
train
system
in China and Russia both have a groundbreaking contribution to improving its
overall
communication
system
and
many
countries
have
started
adopting this model.

On the other hand
,
public
transport
system
plays an essential role in interconnecting the
different
parts of the cities and most
people
use
this
system
to travel to
different
places. Though
trains
can
improve
the city
transport
facilities, it is not an alternative to the existing
road
transports
.
That is
why
many
people
believe that the national budget should be
utilised
on improving
public
transport
for the sake of better
communication
for mass
people
.
For instance
, the
train
line in the UK has always contributed to a great extent to the
overall
transport
system
in the
country
.
Nevertheless
,
public
transport
has always been the main commuting mode for UK citizens.

To conclude
, I believe that the national budget should be
fairly
distributed for the improvement of the
fast
and new rail
system
as well
as
public
transports
for the
overall
expansion and improvement of the transportation
system
in a
country
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
334 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts