The speed of transportation is increasing by novel technologies and consequently, investment in high speed trains between cities witnesses growth. However, some people disagree and think governments should spend on existing public transportation instead of new railways. This essay will discuss both views and compares their cons and pros.
On one side, high speed trains’ technologies are growing while they can absorb lots of investors for developing. Although, the fast trains are built the less transportation time spends among cities, but this is a costly mean of transportation. For example, in Japan some people cannot afford this technology so they use old trains yet. Thus, for the future, it is better to work on price optimization because if a large group of people cannot afford, trains will become useless and obsolete in the near future.
On the other side, others believe that the investments should be on the daily domestic commuting system such as subways. This kind of transportation plays a significant role in routine of people especially who live in metropolitans. This a cheap way of reaching a destination which can be developed by less spending money while, the yield can go up incredibly. Great Britain has a successful experience whom renovates its old public transport fleet with lower cost than high speed systems and more efficient. Therefore, investing in city public transportation can highly affect society satisfaction which is important for both people and administrative sections.
To summarize the essay, investing in the existing transportation system not only satisfies citizens, but also is the best way instead of invests in new expensive technologies. Government should optimize the capital which they want to assign to different transportation systems for existing systems or new cheap high-speed railways.
The
speed
of
transportation
is increasing by novel
technologies
and
consequently
, investment in high
speed
trains
between cities witnesses growth.
However
,
some
people
disagree and
think
governments
should spend on existing public
transportation
instead
of new railways. This essay will discuss both views and compares their cons and pros.
On one side, high
speed
trains’
technologies
are growing while they can absorb lots of investors for developing. Although, the
fast
trains
are built
the less
transportation
time spends among cities,
but
this is a costly mean of
transportation
.
For example
, in Japan
some
people
cannot afford this
technology
so
they
use
old
trains
yet
.
Thus
, for the future, it is better to work on price optimization
because
if a large group of
people
cannot afford,
trains
will become useless and obsolete in the near future.
On the other side, others believe that the investments should be on the daily domestic commuting
system
such as subways. This kind of
transportation
plays a significant role in routine of
people
especially
who
live
in metropolitans. This a
cheap
way of reaching a destination which can
be developed
by less spending money while, the yield can go up
incredibly
. Great Britain has a successful experience
whom
renovates its
old
public transport fleet with lower cost than high
speed
systems
and more efficient.
Therefore
, investing in city public
transportation
can
highly
affect society satisfaction which is
important
for both
people
and administrative sections.
To summarize
the essay, investing in the existing
transportation
system
not
only
satisfies citizens,
but
also
is the best way
instead
of invests in new expensive
technologies
.
Government
should optimize the capital which they want to assign to
different
transportation
systems
for existing
systems
or new
cheap
high-speed railways.