Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.1

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. v. 1
Few individuals in a number of countries are of the school of thought that it is obligatory to spend a huge financial sum on building railroads for rapid train movement across cities while others hold a different opinion, believing it is best to enhance an already existing transport system with huge finances. In my opinion, large financial sum should be spent on constructing railway lines as this is the medium through which heavy duty luggage, diesel, fuel and gas are transported, as already existing public transport system can be maintained periodically. The financial quota for construction of a railway line should be a huge sum. This is because, the passage for trains needs to be constructed to standards, as trains are the major means of transporting heavy industrial parts, swiftly across cities, goods which cannot be transported via roads or by air due to their enormous weight. Asides that, the number of people on board in a train at a particular time is a tonne, the weight of both goods and humans are projected onto the railtrack. Thus, large financial sum, expertise and standard building materials are of utmost importance when considering the railway construction. Spending huge sum of money to enhance an already existing means of public transportation can be considered as wastage and improper financial spending. Though, it’s of the utmost importance of service and improve transportation system, the cost allocation should not be outrageous, because basic maintenance is all that is required to avoid accidents. For instance, the cost of improving a federal government road is less than a fraction of the sum required to build a road, which is far more cost protective in comparison to birthing a railway. In view of this, large allocations are unnecessary for maintenance of an existing transport system. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that huge financial sums should be allocated to railway construction rather than improving already existing transport system which requires lesser finances. .
Few individuals in a number of countries are of the school of
thought
that it is obligatory to spend a
huge
financial
sum
on building railroads for rapid
train
movement across cities while others hold a
different
opinion, believing it is best to enhance an
already
existing
transport
system
with
huge
finances. In my opinion, large
financial
sum
should
be spent
on constructing
railway
lines as this is the medium through which
heavy duty
luggage, diesel, fuel and gas
are transported
, as
already
existing
public
transport
system
can
be maintained
periodically
.

The
financial
quota for construction of a
railway
line should be a
huge
sum
. This is
because
, the passage for
trains
needs to
be constructed
to standards, as
trains
are the major means of transporting heavy industrial parts,
swiftly
across cities,
goods
which cannot
be transported
via roads or by air due to their enormous weight. Asides that, the number of
people
on board in a
train
at a particular time is a tonne, the weight of both
goods
and humans
are projected
onto the
railtrack
.
Thus
, large
financial
sum
, expertise and standard building materials are of utmost importance when considering the
railway
construction.

Spending
huge
sum
of money to enhance an
already
existing
means of public transportation can
be considered
as wastage and improper
financial
spending. Though, it’s of the utmost importance of service and
improve
transportation
system
, the cost allocation should not be outrageous,
because
basic maintenance is all that
is required
to avoid accidents.
For instance
, the cost of improving a federal
government
road is less than a fraction of the
sum
required to build a road, which is far more cost protective
in comparison
to birthing a
railway
. In view of this, large allocations are unnecessary for maintenance of an
existing
transport
system.

In conclusion
, I am of the opinion that
huge
financial
sums
should
be allocated
to
railway
construction
rather
than improving
already
existing
transport
system
which requires lesser finances.
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
44Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS essay In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
327 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts