Nowadays some parents afford to use all of their children's free activities for learning because they will waste their children's time if they do not give them education sooner. It might be sensible for some reason. Thus, giving children chance to approach knowledge sooner brings benefits to them and their parents as well.
At first, parents will have advantages when they teach their babies sooner than the others. Children normally have about five years before they are taken to the school. In other words, when parents want to use this type of time to support them insight, and teach them skills or some qualities of a good person such as being calm, careful, kind and so on. With these kind of quality, they will be much more confident than the others. For instance, my boss has two children and his oldest daughter has been taking to the institute two years sooner than normal ones. The result of this is she has performed quite well at the primary institute both for her qualities and her knowledge.
In addition, money may also be a foremost reason that many parents concern when they give education to their children. Although not everyone has enough resources to invest to their next generation, they also want their children being taught at a high quality institute and being much more affordable as well. As a result of this, it is a common trend to take their children's leisure time to learn because someone stated that time is a property. My neighbour's children, for example, have been taken to the kindergarten so that their parents are too busy at work and they are not able to spend all time for their beloved.
All in all, I think this should be acceptable for parents when giving education to their children instead of letting them being leisure. However, parents should also follow their children's progress because they will be lost twice the resources if their children are free.
Nowadays
some
parents
afford to
use
all of their
children's
free activities for learning
because
they will waste their
children's
time
if they do not give them education
sooner
. It might be sensible for
some
reason.
Thus
, giving
children
chance to approach knowledge
sooner
brings benefits to them and their
parents
as well
.
At
first
,
parents
will have advantages when they teach their babies
sooner
than the others.
Children
normally
have about five years
before
they
are taken
to the school.
In other words
, when
parents
want to
use
this type of
time
to support them insight, and teach them
skills
or
some
qualities
of a
good
person such as being calm, careful, kind and
so
on. With
these kind
of
quality
, they will be much more confident than the others.
For instance
, my boss has two
children
and his oldest daughter has been taking to the institute two years
sooner
than normal ones. The result of this is she has performed quite well at the primary institute both for her
qualities
and her knowledge.
In addition
, money may
also
be a foremost reason that
many
parents
concern when they give education to their
children
. Although not everyone has
enough
resources to invest to their
next
generation, they
also
want their
children
being taught
at a high
quality
institute and being much more affordable
as well
.
As a result
of this, it is a common trend to take their
children's
leisure
time
to learn
because
someone stated that
time
is a property. My
neighbour
's
children
,
for example
, have
been taken
to the kindergarten
so
that their
parents
are too busy at
work and
they are not able to spend all
time
for their beloved.
All in all, I
think
this should be acceptable for
parents
when giving education to their
children
instead
of letting them being leisure.
However
,
parents
should
also
follow their
children's
progress
because
they will
be lost
twice the resources if their
children
are free.