Based on the world historical events, it can be seen that there was more violence and confrontation under men's leadership compare to the women's. Some people believe that one of the solutions to world peace would be by appointing more women leaders. I personally disagree with the statement as I believe that gender does not affect to crime or conflicts, but it depends on the leader's personality.
Many people think that there are more conflicts and wars under the leadership of men. History had shown that due to several male leaders' ambition, some of the bloodiest war had happened. One of the examples is Adolf Hitler who had the ambition to conquered Europe. Due to his ideology, there were more than 10 million people died during World War 2. And in another case, Japan had lost so many lives, due to its dictator leader King Akihito, whereas Nagasaki and Hiroshima had been bombed by the American. Based on these historical events, some people have a conclusion that men have the tendency to use military force in their leadership which would trigger conflicts.
On the other hand, a group of people believe that conflict and confrontation are lower under women's leadership, therefore there should be more women leaders in the world. However, some people disagree with it, since there were some women leaders who also had shown their strength and power. For example, the former Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher had triggered the Malvinas war between Argentine and England. Many experts think that gender would have less correlation with conflict or violence. They believe that personal ideology, ambition and character are the factors that affect leadership style.
In conclusion, although history had shown that there were more wars and confrontations during male leaderships, some female leaders also showed their ambition and aggressiveness. I personally believe that the sex of leaders would not have significant effect on their leadership style, but it is their personality that affected their leadership style.
Based on the
world
historical
events
, it can be
seen
that there was more violence and confrontation under
men
's
leadership
compare to the women's.
Some
people
believe
that one of the solutions to
world
peace would be by appointing more women
leaders
. I
personally
disagree with the statement as I
believe
that gender does not affect to crime or
conflicts
,
but
it depends on the leader's personality.
Many
people
think
that there are more
conflicts
and
wars
under the
leadership
of
men
. History had shown that due to several male leaders'
ambition
,
some
of the bloodiest
war
had happened. One of the examples is Adolf Hitler who had the
ambition
to conquered Europe. Due to his ideology, there were more than 10 million
people
died
during
World
War
2. And in another case, Japan had lost
so
many
lives
, due to its dictator
leader
King Akihito, whereas Nagasaki and Hiroshima had
been bombed
by the American. Based on these historical
events
,
some
people
have a conclusion that
men
have the tendency to
use
military force in their
leadership
which would trigger conflicts.
On the other hand
, a group of
people
believe
that
conflict
and confrontation are lower under women's
leadership
,
therefore
there should be more women
leaders
in the
world
.
However
,
some
people
disagree with it, since there were
some
women
leaders
who
also
had shown their strength and power.
For example
, the former Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher had triggered the
Malvinas
war
between Argentine and England.
Many
experts
think
that gender would have less correlation with
conflict
or violence. They
believe
that personal ideology,
ambition
and character are the factors that affect
leadership
style.
In conclusion
, although history had shown that there were more
wars
and confrontations during male
leaderships
,
some
female
leaders
also
showed
their
ambition
and aggressiveness. I
personally
believe
that the sex of
leaders
would not have significant effect on their
leadership
style,
but
it is their personality that
affected
their
leadership
style.