Health issues caused by consumption of junk food has become utmost importance around worldwide as it deteriorates the immune system. There are several reasons due to which people intake outside meals frequently. Enormous masses believe that the political establishments should increase taxation on these types of foods to discourage people from consuming such meals. However, in my perspective, this approach will not lead to desired outcomes which will be hashed out in upcoming paragraphs of this essay with compelling examples.
At the outset, the higher tax is unlikely to reduce its consumption. The foremost reason is sedentary lifestyle where people not participating in any physical work are less likely to follow a healthy lifestyle. Furthermore, their working schedules are tightly packed, they merely cook proper meals at home and prefer to eat outside. Consequently, implementing taxes on junk food will have little impact on its buy especially working class. Because people who are health conscious will anyway maintain their nutritious diet.
In contrast, raising awareness among citizens and promoting organic eatables might be fruitful to decline intake fast food. The government should make healthy food more affordable so that it is available to all sections of the society. For instance, a recent survey in developed country revealed that middle and lower class are compelled to eat fast food as they cannot afford healthy meals. Therefore, the government can open eateries country wise to sell healthy diet at affordable charges.
To conclude, raising taxes on junk food has less possibility of reducing consumption and will impact low earning groups of society. However, government can make laws to check the quality of production of such eatables. In addition, it should also make nutritious meal more and more affordable.
Health issues caused by consumption of junk
food
has become utmost importance around worldwide as it deteriorates the immune system. There are several reasons due to which
people
intake outside
meals
frequently
. Enormous masses believe that the political establishments should increase taxation on these types of
foods
to discourage
people
from consuming such
meals
.
However
, in my perspective, this approach will not lead to desired outcomes which will
be hashed
out in upcoming paragraphs of this essay with compelling examples.
At the outset, the higher tax is unlikely to
reduce
its consumption. The foremost reason is sedentary lifestyle where
people
not participating in any physical work are less likely to follow a
healthy
lifestyle.
Furthermore
, their working schedules are
tightly
packed, they
merely
cook proper
meals
at home and prefer to eat outside.
Consequently
, implementing taxes on junk
food
will have
little
impact on its
buy
especially
working
class
.
Because
people
who are health conscious will anyway maintain their nutritious diet.
In contrast
, raising awareness among citizens and promoting organic eatables might be fruitful to decline intake
fast
food
. The
government
should
make
healthy
food
more affordable
so
that it is available to all sections of the society.
For instance
, a recent survey in
developed country
revealed that middle and lower
class
are compelled
to eat
fast
food
as they cannot afford
healthy
meals
.
Therefore
, the
government
can open eateries country wise to sell
healthy
diet at affordable charges.
To conclude
, raising taxes on junk
food
has less possibility of reducing consumption and will impact low earning groups of society.
However
,
government
can
make
laws to
check
the quality of production of such eatables.
In addition
, it should
also
make
nutritious
meal
more and more affordable.