It is commonly believed that private healthcare services are rather affordable for a mere person. This essay will analyse both merits and demerits of health services being catered by profit-making companies, and I think the disadvantages outweigh its advantages.
On the one hand, state-owned healthcare institutions may benefit from private health companies. This is because private hospitals may share responsibilities with state hospitals in taking care of the public’s health, which decompresses the burden shouldered by national health systems in terms of overload of patients. With patients being allocated to a private hospital, the waiting lists for examinations and operations are substantially shortened in public hospitals. As a result, state-own health systems are free from the overload, enabling more human and facility resources to be available. Consequently, this system would allow each patient to be treated with higher quality as more machines and health staffs would be utilized per one person.
On the other hand, the biggest disadvantage of the private healthcare system is its price being extravagant for many ordinary people. For example, one’s treatment fee in a profit-oriented hospital can twice or three times as high as it should be in those subsidized by the government. With such a high price, only the affluent can afford a treatment in a private hospital, while those with low salary cannot. Consequently, this situation would worsen the well-being of the society in a whole, and deepen the gap between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion, while private hospitals truly reduce the pressure on government-owned hospitals regarding the overload of patients, the profit-yielding healthcare system may put even a greater burden on its clients because of its extravagant cost of treatment. Therefore, I believe its disadvantage obviously outweighs the advantage.
It is
commonly
believed that
private
healthcare services are
rather
affordable for a mere person. This essay will
analyse
both merits and demerits of
health
services
being catered
by profit-making
companies
, and I
think
the disadvantages outweigh its advantages.
On the one hand, state-
owned
healthcare institutions may benefit from
private
health
companies
. This is
because
private
hospitals
may share responsibilities with state
hospitals
in taking care of the public’s
health
, which decompresses the burden shouldered by national
health
systems
in terms of overload of
patients
. With
patients
being allocated
to a
private
hospital
, the waiting lists for examinations and operations are
substantially
shortened in public
hospitals
.
As a result
, state-
own
health
systems
are free from the overload, enabling more human and facility resources to be available.
Consequently
, this
system
would
allow
each
patient
to
be treated
with higher quality as more machines and
health
staffs would
be utilized
per one person.
On the other hand
, the biggest disadvantage of the
private
healthcare
system
is its price being extravagant for
many
ordinary
people
.
For example
, one’s treatment fee in a profit-oriented
hospital
can twice or three times as high as it should be in those subsidized by the
government
. With such a high price,
only
the affluent can afford a treatment in a
private
hospital
, while those with low salary cannot.
Consequently
, this situation would worsen the well-being of the society in a whole, and deepen the gap between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion
, while
private
hospitals
truly
reduce
the pressure on
government
-
owned
hospitals
regarding the overload of
patients
, the profit-yielding healthcare
system
may put even a greater burden on its clients
because
of its extravagant cost of treatment.
Therefore
, I believe its disadvantage
obviously
outweighs the advantage.