National events and public celebrations are part of government spending. However, it is often argued whether an excessive amount of money from the state budget should be used for events or money should be allocated for other needs. I personally tend to favour the latter statement and believe that money should be directed on the development of infrastructure or modernize existing ones, while money on holding events should be used from sponsorship.
To begin with, the government is directly responsible for improving the welfare of the population. In other words, investments in the improvement of infrastructure in the form of hospitals, education institutions or manufacturing are believed to be a straightforward way to improve the standard of people’s living. This is because it would have a knock-on effect on population such as increasing life expectancy, growing literacy and decreasing unemployment rate. By contrast, public spending allocated on annual public celebrations may enhance only joyfulness for a few days rather than the quality of life in general.
However, despite the costly holding events, they play a crucial role in the creation of close-knit community boosting public’s spirits and raising proud in the country by honoring traditions. For this reason, the governments may engage investment in national festivals. This is important because it is not only may contribute to saving money for significantly important needs but also can enhance the status of a country among residents due to it encourages them to uphold long-standing traditional events.
In conclusion, although public festivals are a key to creating a strong bond and feelings of pride in the country, from my point of view, the administration may attract funds from sponsors; instead, saved money may be used to upgrade infrastructure as it has prolonged effects on people’s well-being.
National
events
and
public
celebrations are part of
government
spending.
However
, it is
often
argued whether an excessive amount of
money
from the state budget should be
used
for
events
or
money
should
be allocated
for other needs. I
personally
tend to
favour
the latter statement and believe that
money
should
be directed
on the development of infrastructure or modernize existing ones, while
money
on holding
events
should be
used
from sponsorship.
To
begin
with, the
government
is
directly
responsible for improving the welfare of the population.
In other words
, investments in the improvement of infrastructure in the form of hospitals, education institutions or manufacturing
are believed
to be a straightforward way to
improve
the standard of
people
’s living. This is
because
it would have a knock-on effect on population such as increasing life expectancy, growing literacy and decreasing unemployment rate. By contrast,
public
spending allocated on annual
public
celebrations may enhance
only
joyfulness for a few days
rather
than the quality of life
in general
.
However
, despite the costly holding
events
, they play a crucial role in the creation of close-knit community boosting
public’s
spirits and raising proud in the country by honoring traditions.
For this reason
, the
governments
may engage investment in national festivals. This is
important
because
it is not
only
may contribute to saving
money
for
significantly
important
needs
but
also
can enhance the status of a country among residents due to it encourages them to uphold long-standing traditional
events
.
In conclusion
, although
public
festivals are a key to creating a strong bond and feelings of pride in the country, from my point of view, the administration may attract funds from sponsors;
instead
, saved
money
may be
used
to upgrade infrastructure as it has prolonged effects on
people
’s well-being.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes