Compared to roadways, railways can be a better choice for government investments in transportation. I completely agree with this statement and in this essay, I will state the reasons for my view.
Despite of the wide spectrum of the means of transport, trains could be preferred compared to the roads due to following reasons. Firstly, railways are more environment-friendly compared to cars. For instance, it is possible to run trains with electricity that can be generated via renewal fuels like hydro- electricity or solar power plants; compared to cars that mostly run on the carbon-emitting gasoline or petrol. Additionally, building better roads could mean that there are more cars on the roads producing more carbon-dioxide and other harmful gases that contribute to the global warming.
Secondly, trains are more economical. Although the initial investment in the railway infrastructure could be high compared to roads, in long run it is more economical for the government as the cost is shared among the travelers. Additionally, train routes can be adjusted based on public’s demand to optimize their utility.
Lastly, trains are less accident prone and more comfortable and faster means compared to cars. To illustrate, the bullet trains of Japan and Mag-lev trains in china set the examples of the high speed railways built with modern technology programmed to reduce accidents and fine-tune speed limits to reduce travel times.
In conclusion, compared to cars, railways are is environment-friendly, economical and safe for the commuters. It is recommended, that governments invest more in public transport that is sustainable as well as offers better return on investment.
Compared to roadways,
railways
can be a better choice for
government
investments in transportation. I completely
agree
with this statement and in this essay, I will state the reasons for my view.
Despite of
the wide spectrum of the means of transport,
trains
could
be preferred
compared to the
roads
due to following reasons.
Firstly
,
railways
are more environment-friendly compared to
cars
.
For instance
, it is possible to run
trains
with electricity that can
be generated
via renewal fuels like hydro- electricity or solar power plants; compared to
cars
that
mostly
run on the carbon-emitting gasoline or petrol.
Additionally
, building better
roads
could mean that there are more
cars
on the
roads
producing more carbon-dioxide and other harmful gases that contribute to the global warming.
Secondly
,
trains
are more economical. Although the initial investment in the
railway
infrastructure could be high compared to
roads
, in long run it is more economical for the
government
as the cost
is shared
among the travelers.
Additionally
,
train
routes can
be adjusted
based on public’s demand to optimize their utility.
Lastly
,
trains
are less
accident prone
and more comfortable and faster means compared to
cars
. To illustrate, the bullet
trains
of Japan and
Mag-lev
trains
in
china
set the examples of the high speed
railways
built with modern technology programmed to
reduce
accidents and fine-tune speed limits to
reduce
travel times.
In conclusion
, compared to
cars
,
railways
are is environment-friendly, economical and safe for the commuters. It
is recommended
, that
governments
invest more in public transport
that is
sustainable
as well
as offers better return on investment.