The topic of traffic congestion is a very important concern for society at the moment. The way that providing free public transportation contributes to reduce traffic congestion is one of alternatives.
We should start by taking a look at expense that government must need to pay. It is good idea that government provide free public transportations for 24/7. Because it will cause more commuters and citizens to use transportation instead of taking their individual cars and congestion will be reduced. Nonetheless, it would be covered by taxes and if more residents take transportation, expense will increase by chance. Also there is a chance to argue by tax payers.
Turning to the second point view, it is helpful to the environment. The environmental pollution is caused by various reasons. One of various reasons can be the cars. For instance, Seoul, Capital city of South Korea, provided free transportation for a day for better quality of air. As result, 2 times citizens used transportation than usual and air pollution improved. Therefore, the government provide complimentary service that public transportations encourage to use public transportation to citizens and will increase commuters.
In conclusion, both arguments have strong arguments. The environment is not seen our eyes but definitely benefit every single of us. Therefore, I totally agree with that government encourage to use transportation by complimentary if government provide proper time schedule and can support enough financial.
The topic of traffic congestion is a
very
important
concern for society at the moment. The way that providing free
public
transportation
contributes to
reduce
traffic congestion is one of alternatives.
We should
start
by taking a look at expense that
government
must
need to pay. It is
good
idea
that
government
provide free
public
transportations
for 24/7.
Because
it will cause more commuters and citizens to
use
transportation
instead
of taking their individual cars and congestion will be
reduced
. Nonetheless, it would
be covered
by taxes and if more residents take
transportation
, expense will increase by chance.
Also
there is a chance to argue by tax payers.
Turning to the second point view, it is helpful to the environment. The environmental pollution
is caused
by various reasons. One of various reasons can be the cars.
For instance
, Seoul, Capital city of South Korea, provided free
transportation
for a day for better quality of air. As result, 2 times citizens
used
transportation
than usual and air pollution
improved
.
Therefore
, the
government
provide complimentary service that
public
transportations
encourage to
use
public
transportation
to citizens and will increase commuters.
In conclusion
, both arguments have strong arguments. The environment is not
seen
our eyes
but
definitely benefit every single of us.
Therefore
, I
totally
agree
with that
government
encourage to
use
transportation
by complimentary if
government
provide proper time schedule and can support
enough
financial.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
18Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes