Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? v.10
There has been much discussion revolving around the decision of Government money investment in arts and public services. Although, I agree that it is important to spend money on public services, I do not think spending on the arts is a waste of money.
The merits of public services and people who are getting benefits are apparent. Firstly, public services like Hospitals, education, roads are key to everyone life in this day and age. This is mainly due to fact that middle/poor class people are mainly depend on public services. If, Government does investment in public services than we will not get proper service from related sectors. As for common men there are some basic needs which they are not able to fulfill such as food, home, cloths. So, basically if Government spend money on basic entities that will not only create jobs but, it will make people life easier, and they can get home and enough food to survive. For example, average men can get basic medical treatment free or at minimum cost from Government Hospitals as compare to private Hospitals. They don't have to travel to another city for basic facilities.
In contrast, some others may claim that arts, such as music and theatre are play vital role in country development. Apparently, It creates opportunities for jobless and represent the history of any country. However, in modern-day society, arts such as music and theatre are necessary for the entertainment and it helps everyone to make their lives as enjoyable. It can be seen that spending on the arts is not a waste of money.
Having considered both views, I think Government investment in public services are of overriding investment in arts. Also, I would suggest that Government to provide basic services related to food, electricity and education, which I believe is soundly based on the above reasoning I have presented.
There has been much discussion revolving around the decision of
Government
money
investment
in
arts
and
public
services
. Although, I
agree
that it is
important
to spend money on
public
services
, I do not
think
spending on the
arts
is a waste of money.
The merits of
public
services
and
people
who are getting benefits are apparent.
Firstly
,
public
services
like Hospitals, education, roads are key to everyone life in this day and age. This is
mainly
due to fact that middle/poor
class
people
are
mainly
depend on
public
services
.
If
,
Government
does
investment
in
public
services
than we will not
get
proper
service
from related sectors. As for common
men
there are
some
basic
needs which they are not able to fulfill such as food, home, cloths.
So
,
basically
if
Government
spend money on
basic
entities that will not
only
create jobs
but
, it will
make
people
life easier, and they can
get
home and
enough
food to survive.
For example
, average
men
can
get
basic
medical treatment free or at minimum cost from
Government
Hospitals as compare to private Hospitals. They don't
have to
travel to another city for
basic
facilities.
In contrast
,
some
others may claim that
arts
, such as music and
theatre
are play vital role in country development.
Apparently
, It creates opportunities for jobless and represent the history of any country.
However
, in modern-day society,
arts
such as music and
theatre
are necessary for the
entertainment and
it
helps
everyone to
make
their
lives
as enjoyable. It can be
seen
that spending on the
arts
is not a waste of money.
Having considered both views, I
think
Government
investment
in
public
services
are of overriding
investment
in
arts
.
Also
, I would suggest that
Government
to provide
basic
services
related to food, electricity and education, which I believe is
soundly
based on the above reasoning I have presented.