There is no doubt that a government should spend it's resources frugally and wisely in different areas. Therefore, it has been suggested by a number of individuals that the investment of an authority should be spent to the betterment of public services rather than squandering money in entertainment purposes. However, I do not accord with the statement and in this essay, I will highlight my opinion with pertinent examples.
First and foremost, putting money in a diverse portfolio can make any country's economy stronger than before. This means that an art industry may support the government in the future to generate a steady income flow with more revenues. For example, many US-based renowned music
and movie companies and many esteemed artists and actors contribute a decent percentage in the GDP growth of US by putting taxes. As a consequence, the economy might not have to rely on a single contribution from a specific sector.
Another advantage is that these creative spaces would divert a number of people to alter their profession. That is to say, as a wave of new professions and skills can be created along with a new field like art, the pressure on the government would be lessened. For instance, there are a growing number of South Asian fresh graduates who do not find any satisfactory work in the creative field due to the absence of artistic companies. Furthermore, many families crave for good music, movies, and theatre performances for the only mean of recreation in their lives.
To sum up, a government budget in the art would not only bolster their economy by creating a new source of earning, but also unveil a new line of work for the unemployed population, despite the significance of better public service. In my opinion, a government should keep creating more avenues for a better investment.
There is no doubt that a
government
should spend
it's
resources
frugally
and
wisely
in
different
areas.
Therefore
, it has
been suggested
by a number of individuals that the investment of an authority should
be spent
to the betterment of public services
rather
than squandering money in entertainment purposes.
However
, I do not accord with the statement and in this essay, I will highlight my opinion with pertinent examples.
First
and foremost, putting money in a diverse portfolio can
make
any country's economy stronger than
before
. This means that an art industry may support the
government
in the future to generate a steady income flow with more revenues.
For example
,
many
US-based renowned
music
and
movie
companies
and
many
esteemed artists and actors contribute a decent percentage in the GDP growth of US by putting taxes. As a consequence, the economy might not
have to
rely on a single contribution from a specific sector.
Another advantage is that these creative spaces would divert a number of
people
to alter their profession.
That is
to say, as a wave of
new
professions and
skills
can
be created
along with a
new
field like art, the pressure on the
government
would
be lessened
.
For instance
, there are a growing number of South Asian fresh graduates who do not find any satisfactory work in the creative field due to the absence of artistic
companies
.
Furthermore
,
many
families crave for
good
music, movies, and
theatre
performances for the
only
mean of recreation in their
lives
.
To sum up, a
government
budget in the art would not
only
bolster their economy by creating a
new
source of earning,
but
also
unveil a
new
line of work for the unemployed population, despite the significance of better public service. In my opinion, a
government
should
keep
creating more avenues for a better investment.