Giving lectures in auditorium to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To whta extend do you agree or disagree. v.1
Giving lectures in auditorium to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To whta extend v. 1
Art is considered an essential part of all countries around the world, however many people think governments need to spend more of their budget on other aspects of the economy because they believe spending on art is wasting money. In my opinion, I disagree that governments should decrease budgets for art development with the reasons shown below.
Firstly, art is considered an important literature of a country which records history. For example, people used to draw pictures to document/remember something like the appearance of a building or person before the camera was produced. Moreover, in some countries, art has a significant role with governments establishing and maintaining organizations to protect it. Therefore, people in these countries can visit museums free of cost as maintenance and promotion fees are undertaken by the government. If they do not allocate enough money on art, it might not be protected well, then people will not know the history though art in the future.
On the other hand, art benefits the economy of a country. For instance, movies, music, and crafts are derived from art. These are considered very lucrative in some nations like Korea, thus the films of Korea are translated into many languages, then sold to different countries. If the films are widely popular, it will increase the income of a country because the number of tourists who visit Korea will increase.
In conclusion, although many individuals think that the government needs to spend money in other areas, I believe that allocating more budget for art could benefit the economy and it is essential of recording the history of a country.
Art
is considered
an essential part of all
countries
around the world,
however
many
people
think
governments
need to spend more of their budget on other aspects of the economy
because
they believe spending on
art
is wasting money. In my opinion, I disagree that
governments
should decrease budgets for
art
development with the reasons shown below.
Firstly
,
art
is considered
an
important
literature of a
country
which records history.
For example
,
people
used
to draw pictures to document/remember something like the appearance of a building or person
before
the camera
was produced
.
Moreover
, in
some
countries
,
art
has a significant role with
governments
establishing and maintaining organizations to protect it.
Therefore
,
people
in these
countries
can visit museums free of cost as maintenance and promotion fees are undertaken by the
government
. If they do not allocate
enough
money on
art
, it might not
be protected
well, then
people
will not know the history though
art
in the future.
On the other hand
,
art
benefits the economy of a
country
.
For instance
, movies, music, and crafts
are derived
from
art
. These
are considered
very
lucrative in
some
nations like Korea,
thus
the films of Korea
are translated
into
many
languages, then sold to
different
countries
. If the films are
widely
popular, it will increase the income of a
country
because
the number of tourists who visit Korea will increase.
In conclusion
, although
many
individuals
think
that the
government
needs to spend money in other areas, I believe that allocating more budget for
art
could benefit the economy and it is essential of recording the history of a
country
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes