Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online Do you agree or disagree v.2

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online v. 2
A highly controversial issue relates to whether the authorities should regulate the design of recently built buildings in enormous cities or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view andd then provide my own opinion on the matter. On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of controlling the scheme of lately erected constructions considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for this belief is that the governments could maintain safety for people using the buildings. It is also possible to say that the design of recent constructions must meet some safety standards so that they will not cause dangers to their users in the future. For instance, there are earthquakes frequently occurring frequently in Taiwan. Hence, its government compels most of the buildings to meet some standards to be sustainable to earthquakes. On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that people who invest in the buildings should have rights to design them according to their preferences. People often hold this notion because there will be a wide variety of amazing constructions if the designers feel free to be creative in designing the structures. In other words, being free to decide on the design of the buildings, designers may create extraordinary erections which will contribute to architectural diversity of a country. To illustrate, Landmark 81 has become the tallest building in Vietnam with an amazing design due to the permission of creativity. In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their strong points. On balance, however, I suppose that the design of new constructions should be regulated by the governments because all of the buildings should be guaranteed to be safe in use.
A
highly
controversial issue relates to whether the authorities should regulate the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
of recently built
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
in enormous cities or not. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view
Possible spelling mistake found.
andd
then provide my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
opinion on the matter.

On one side of the argument, there are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who argue that the benefits of controlling the scheme of lately erected
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
considerably
outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for this belief is that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
could maintain safety for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
. It is
also
possible to say that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
of recent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
safety standards
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that they will not cause
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
to their users in the future.
For instance
, there are earthquakes
frequently
occurring
frequently
in Taiwan.
Hence
, its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
compels most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
standards to be sustainable to earthquakes.

On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the opposing case. It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
argued that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who invest in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
should have rights to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
them according to their preferences.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
hold this notion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there will be a wide variety of amazing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
if the designers feel free to be creative in designing the structures.
In other words
, being free to decide on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
, designers may create extraordinary erections which will contribute to architectural diversity of a country. To illustrate, Landmark 81 has become the tallest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
in Vietnam with an amazing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
due to the permission of creativity.

In conclusion
, I believe both arguments have their strong points. On balance,
however
, I suppose that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
design
of new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
should
be regulated
by the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
Consider using "all the".
all of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
should
be guaranteed
to be safe in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes
Speak a new language so that the world will be a new world.
Rumi

IELTS essay Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
296 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts