In many countries, the performance of students is evaluated by means of conducting regular exams by the end of every semester. The examinations provide the education institutes a yardstick to assess the students effectively. There are alternate ways to evaluate the academic skills of the scholar, such as assigning assignments and projects to name a few.
The formal examinations are considered the most reliable form of assessing the progression of the pupil. Most importantly, conducting these exams allows the stakeholders to acknowledge the intellectual and academic knowledge of each individual with a physical evidence of the document. For instance, if a student scores low in assessment despite his excellent conduct in papers, the student can get his results reevaluated in order to rectify any unintentional error in marking. It is for this reason the formal examinations are considered convenient and reliable.
Traditional examinations are not the only way to assess the pupil; there are numerous ways to evaluate how much the student have progressed. Instead of conducting exams, the mentors can assign mini projects and assignments which could involve the mixture of the syllabus. The students will implement their learnings during undertaking those tasks and submit it to their teachers once accomplished. As an example, the instructor can assign a practical project to its students which will not only help them to evaluate their performance but also expose the pupil to practicality and research. Overall, assessments are not only limited to conventional exams, but extents to the unconventional means of evaluation.
To sum up, the conventional examinations are the medium through which the work of scholars is assessed by the end of each educational cycle around the world. Perhaps, the traditional way of assessment is tried-and-tested method. Nonetheless, there are other unique solutions available to examine the students.
In
many
countries, the performance of
students
is evaluated
by means of conducting regular exams by the
end
of every semester. The
examinations
provide the education institutes a yardstick to assess the
students
effectively
. There are alternate
ways
to evaluate the academic
skills
of the scholar, such as assigning assignments and projects to name a few.
The formal
examinations
are considered
the most reliable form of assessing the progression of the pupil. Most
importantly
, conducting these exams
allows
the stakeholders to acknowledge the intellectual and academic knowledge of each individual with a physical evidence of the document.
For instance
, if a
student
scores low in assessment despite his excellent conduct in papers, the
student
can
get
his results reevaluated in order to rectify any unintentional error in marking. It is
for this reason
the formal
examinations
are considered
convenient and reliable.
Traditional
examinations
are not the
only
way
to assess the pupil; there are numerous
ways
to evaluate how much the
student
have progressed.
Instead
of conducting exams, the mentors can assign mini projects and assignments which could involve the mixture of the syllabus. The
students
will implement their learnings during undertaking those tasks and submit it to their teachers once accomplished. As an example, the instructor can assign a practical project to its
students
which will not
only
help
them to evaluate their performance
but
also
expose the pupil to practicality and research.
Overall
, assessments are not
only
limited to conventional exams,
but
extents to the unconventional means of evaluation.
To sum up, the conventional
examinations
are the medium through which the work of scholars
is assessed
by the
end
of each educational cycle around the world. Perhaps, the traditional
way
of assessment
is tried
-and-
tested
method. Nonetheless, there are other unique solutions available to examine the
students
.