Many people argue that formal examinations are a far better way than practical assessments to judge a student’s performance. I disagree with this statement to a large extent as regular course work and projects completely assess student’s knowledge and creativity at various levels
Assessing students routinely is a more effective way than conducting yearly exams. To begin with, many students perform far better in their regular classes but unfortunately lacks in a pen and paper test. For instance, a brilliant student may be unable to perform to the best of his ability because of ill health. This will eventually hurt his confidence largely and can affect his performance in further exams too. Therefore, assessing the knowledge of a student on the basis of their performance in annual exams alone is not a brilliant idea.
Conversely, there are those who insist that the traditional way of conducting exams judges a student’s ability effectively. They assert that exam conducting bodies meticulously organise the papers and thus every student has an equal opportunity to show their mettle in a three hour exam. While this may be true to a certain extent, I believe that these three hours are not enough to test students’ hard work and the tremendous efforts they put in throughout the year. More crucially, these exams do not assess students on their soft skills such as teamwork, communication skills and even do not take into account factors like discipline and punctuality.
On the other hand, continuous assessment allows teachers to see whether students are progressing. Making them do projects and other activities is also a great way to ensure that they are applying the knowledge they learned in the classroom.
To conclude, although conducting exams in a structured way can tell students’ performance in a span of three hours, these exams do not take into account specific situations that might affect a student from performing to the best of their ability. Hence, in my opinion, continuous assessment is a better way to measure the progress of students.
Many
people
argue that formal examinations are a far better way than practical assessments to judge a
student’s
performance
. I disagree with this statement to a large extent as regular course work and projects completely assess
student’s
knowledge and creativity at various levels
Assessing
students
routinely
is a more effective way than
conducting
yearly exams. To
begin
with,
many
students
perform far better in their regular classes
but
unfortunately lacks in a pen and paper
test
.
For instance
, a brilliant
student
may be unable to perform to the best of his ability
because
of ill health. This will
eventually
hurt his confidence
largely
and can affect his
performance
in
further
exams too.
Therefore
, assessing the knowledge of a
student
on the basis of their
performance
in annual exams alone is not a brilliant
idea
.
Conversely
, there are those who insist that the traditional way of
conducting
exams judges a
student’s
ability
effectively
. They assert that exam
conducting
bodies
meticulously
organise the papers and
thus
every
student
has an equal opportunity to
show
their mettle in a three hour exam. While this may be true to a certain extent, I believe that these three hours are not
enough
to
test
students’
hard
work and the tremendous efforts they put in throughout the year. More
crucially
, these exams do not assess
students
on their soft
skills
such as teamwork, communication
skills
and even do not take into account factors like discipline and punctuality.
On the other hand
, continuous assessment
allows
teachers to
see
whether
students
are progressing. Making them do projects and other activities is
also
a great way to ensure that they are applying the knowledge they learned in the classroom.
To conclude
, although
conducting
exams in a structured way can
tell
students’
performance
in a span of three hours, these exams do not take into account specific situations that might affect a
student
from performing to the best of their ability.
Hence
, in my opinion, continuous assessment is a better way to measure the progress of
students
.