Student’s assessment can only be performed through the conventional style of the scheduled examination. Weekly assignments, monthly projects and other such type of analysis are considered to be ineffective. This essay agrees that the organized style of exams is better because of them being less stressful and more reliable.
There are numerous advantages of choosing official exams on a specified date over continuous valuation methods. Firstly, the student does not have to keep stressing throughout the semester. This happens when the children are over-burdened with project deadlines of several subjects all the time. There have been numerous surveys conducted to analyse student’s responses on the modernized approach of tests and the majority of the students voted against it stating that they are not able to manage their hobbies. This results in the unproductive human mind as a result of emotional disturbance. Secondly, the innovation in testing structure is not trustworthy as students have found alternatives for completing their homework or their quizzes with the help of their seniors. This is because of the unreliability of the pattern where students have the flexibility of completing the work without teacher’s surveillance. For example, open-book assessment of FITT courses allows candidates to give their exam anytime and anywhere, thereby making it easy for the students seeking help from the toppers.
A Combination of traditional and modern approach can innovate an efficient system by giving the advantage of both testing. Students can be asked to work on one project throughout the semester and sit for the final exam at the end. Alternatively, open book exams can be monitored through web camera by respective professors. Hence, changes can be made to overcome the disadvantages to analysing performance on a continual basis.
In conclusion, I firmly agree that structured and conservative approach to examinations should never be replaced with the continual assessment techniques. Although, after taking into consideration the nature of the course, an alternative of combining both styles can be developed and implemented with certain terms and conditions.
Student’s
assessment can
only
be performed
through the conventional style of the scheduled examination. Weekly assignments, monthly projects and other such type of analysis
are considered
to be ineffective. This essay
agrees
that the organized style of exams is better
because
of them being less stressful and more reliable.
There are numerous advantages of choosing official exams on a specified date over continuous valuation methods.
Firstly
, the
student
does not
have to
keep
stressing throughout the semester. This happens when the children are over-burdened with project deadlines of several subjects all the time. There have been numerous surveys conducted to
analyse
student’s
responses on the modernized approach of
tests
and the majority of the
students
voted against it stating that they are not able to manage their hobbies. This results in the unproductive human mind
as a result
of emotional disturbance.
Secondly
, the innovation in testing structure is not trustworthy as
students
have found alternatives for completing their homework or their quizzes with the
help
of their seniors. This is
because
of the unreliability of the pattern where
students
have the flexibility of completing the work without teacher’s surveillance.
For example
, open-book assessment of
FITT
courses
allows
candidates to give their exam anytime and anywhere, thereby making it easy for the
students
seeking
help
from the toppers.
A Combination of traditional and modern approach can innovate an efficient system by giving the advantage of both testing.
Students
can
be asked
to work on one project throughout the semester and sit for the final exam at the
end
.
Alternatively
, open book exams can
be monitored
through web camera by respective professors.
Hence
,
changes
can
be made
to overcome the disadvantages to
analysing
performance on a continual basis.
In conclusion
, I
firmly
agree
that structured and conservative approach to examinations should never
be replaced
with the continual assessment techniques. Although, after taking into consideration the nature of the course, an alternative of combining both styles can
be developed
and implemented with certain terms and conditions.