Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? v.4
Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. with this statement? v. 4
It is thought that the only relevant and fair way to rate the students, is a formal passive type of examination, despite there is another method to assess them, which is by frequent assessment of their performance in workshops and how they perform a project. Although both methods have their odds and cons, but I partially agree with formal examination and I will discuss my point of view in this essay.
Firstly, formal examination provides an easy, unified and a rapid way of assessment. This kind of exams would test your ability to recall information, so the more you have memorized the more you would be liable to get high marks. However, there are a few disadvantages of this method. The first and the foremost is, this method could be unfair in sometimes, as you only can perform the exam once, this one particular time may not suit your state. For example, you might have been sick, and that of course affects the way you perform in your exam, and because this is the only time you will be tested, therefore you could be underestimated or improperly assessed. Another point regarding the objectives of this method is that only your ability to recall will be valued, bypassing your ability to create and work.
In favour of continuous assessment, It is a very effective way to estimate the ability of the student to perform the skills he have learned. In contrast to the other mentioned method, this paradigm is much fairer, as it does not rely on one test but it lasts till the end of your course. But in fact, this method could be more expensive and time consuming.
In a nutshell, each method has its benefits and drawbacks. However we can use a mix of both sorts in order to get the most accurate rating for a student.
It is
thought
that the
only
relevant and
fair
way to rate the students, is a formal passive type of examination, despite there is another
method
to assess them, which is by frequent assessment of their performance in workshops and how they
perform
a project. Although both
methods
have their odds and cons,
but
I
partially
agree
with formal examination and I will discuss my point of view in this essay.
Firstly
, formal examination provides an easy, unified and a rapid way of assessment. This kind of exams would
test
your
ability
to recall information,
so
the more you have memorized the more you would be liable to
get
high marks.
However
, there are a few disadvantages of this
method
. The
first
and the foremost
is
, this
method
could be unfair in
sometimes
, as you
only
can
perform
the exam once, this one particular time may not suit your state.
For example
, you might have been sick, and that
of course
affects the way you
perform
in your exam, and
because
this is the
only
time you will be
tested
,
therefore
you could
be underestimated
or
improperly
assessed. Another point regarding the objectives of this
method
is that
only
your
ability
to recall will
be valued
, bypassing your
ability
to create and work.
In
favour
of continuous assessment, It is a
very
effective way to estimate the
ability
of the student to
perform
the
skills
he
have
learned.
In contrast
to the other mentioned
method
, this paradigm is much fairer, as it does not rely on one
test
but
it lasts till the
end
of your course.
But
in fact, this
method
could be more expensive and
time consuming
.
In a nutshell, each
method
has its benefits and drawbacks.
However
we can
use
a mix of both sorts in order to
get
the most accurate rating for a student.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes