Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? v.16

Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. with this opinion? v. 16
It is sometimes seen that tourist attractions, including museums, important historical sites and prominent monuments, impose a higher fee for the overseas travellers than the local people. I do not agree with this idea and believe that the charges should be exactly the same. From a perspective, it might seem logical to charge foreign tourists more to enter a traditional and historical place as most of those monuments and establishments are state-owned and the government fund those from the tax they collect from the local residences. From this regard, many feel that local residences are already paying a portion of the ticket money through the tax they pay to the government. However, this is a very narrow view and this arrangement dissatisfies the visiting tourists as many of them find it discriminatory. From a broader view, if more foreign travellers are encouraged to visit nationally important tourist attractions and important historical and cultural place, this would bring more foreign tourists and this would ensure more earning from the tourism sector. Furthermore, it would help spread the national and cultural importance around the world. From this perspective, collecting some extra money from the entrance ticket is a shortsighted step. Furthermore, happy tourists encourage their immediate friends and family members to visit a country and some tourist attractions. If those tourists get the impression that they are being changed more money than the local people, they would psychologically feel unhappy and would share their dissatisfaction with others which would mean less foreign tourists. Many shrine and monuments are maintained by the ticket money it collects and if the number of visiting travelers get decreased, it would be tough for the authority to maintain those important places. From this perspective, having an equal entrance fee has a better impact. To conclude, from a broader perspective having the same ticket fee, both for the residence and foreign tourists, to allow the entrance to any nationally and historically important place including museums, art exhibitions, parks and historical places is more beneficial and I completely agree that the fee should not be different.
It is
sometimes
seen
that
tourist
attractions, including museums,
important
historical
sites and prominent monuments, impose a higher
fee
for the overseas
travellers
than the
local
people
. I do not
agree
with this
idea
and believe that the charges should be exactly the same.

From a
perspective
, it might seem logical to charge
foreign
tourists
more to enter a traditional and
historical
place
as most of those monuments and establishments are state-
owned
and the
government
fund those from the tax they collect from the
local
residences. From this regard,
many feel
that
local
residences are already paying a portion of the
ticket
money
through the tax they pay to the
government
.
However
, this is a
very
narrow view and this arrangement dissatisfies the visiting
tourists
as
many
of them find it discriminatory. From a broader view, if more
foreign
travellers
are encouraged
to visit
nationally
important
tourist
attractions and
important
historical
and cultural
place
, this would bring more
foreign
tourists
and this would ensure more earning from the tourism sector.
Furthermore
, it would
help
spread the national and cultural importance around the world. From this
perspective
, collecting
some
extra
money
from the entrance
ticket
is a shortsighted step.

Furthermore
, happy
tourists
encourage their immediate friends and family members to visit a country and
some
tourist
attractions. If those
tourists
get
the impression that they are being
changed
more
money
than the
local
people
, they would
psychologically
feel unhappy and would share their dissatisfaction with others which would mean less
foreign
tourists
.
Many
shrine and monuments
are maintained
by the
ticket
money
it collects and if the number of visiting travelers
get
decreased, it would be tough for the authority to maintain those
important
places
. From this
perspective
, having an equal entrance
fee
has a better impact.

To conclude
, from a broader
perspective
having the same
ticket
fee
, both for the residence and
foreign
tourists
, to
allow
the entrance to any
nationally
and
historically
important
place
including museums, art exhibitions, parks and
historical
places
is more beneficial and I completely
agree
that the
fee
should not be
different
.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
49Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS essay Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. with this opinion? v. 16

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
347 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts