There is no doubt that art is important but it is debatable whether it should be sponsored by the government. Some people insist that the government is wasting money on arts. In their opinion, it is important to spend this money on more useful things. I agree with this view.
For one thing, arts promotions and events can be organized by many other private organizations or society clubs and you do not really need a government intervention to run the show. There are many clubs such as Lion’s club or YMCC clubs that can take the initiative and sponsor such events. For example, a music program or an exhibition of paintings can be organized by a local club and there is no need for the government to sponsor it. There are also many rich people who take pleasure in sponsoring art shows and programmes.
When the government does not have to spend money on arts it can focus on developing core areas like education, healthcare and infrastructure. Poverty, illiteracy and malnutrition are still a major problem in many countries around the world. For example, in India, millions of students still do not go to school. Likewise, there are numerous homeless people. Therefore, instead of spending the public funds on arts, the government should try to improve the health of its people. It should ensure that all children are going to school and they have access to good food and potable water.
In conclusion, while arts events and programmes are important for the society, they should not be sponsored by the tax money contributed by people. The government should focus on more important areas and use its money for the benefit and upliftment of the human society.
There is no doubt that
art
is
important
but
it is debatable whether it should
be sponsored
by the
government
.
Some
people
insist that the
government
is wasting
money
on
arts
. In their opinion, it is
important
to spend this
money
on more useful things. I
agree
with this view.
For one thing,
arts
promotions and
events
can
be organized
by
many
other private organizations or society
clubs
and you do not
really
need a
government
intervention to run the
show
. There are
many
clubs
such as Lion’s
club
or
YMCC
clubs
that can take the initiative and sponsor such
events
.
For example
, a music program or an exhibition of paintings can
be organized
by a local
club
and there is no need for the
government
to sponsor it. There are
also
many
rich
people
who take pleasure in sponsoring
art
shows
and
programmes
.
When the
government
does not
have to
spend
money
on
arts
it can focus on developing core areas like education, healthcare and infrastructure. Poverty, illiteracy and malnutrition are
still
a major problem in
many
countries around the world.
For example
, in India, millions of students
still
do not go to school.
Likewise
, there are numerous homeless
people
.
Therefore
,
instead
of spending the public funds on
arts
, the
government
should try to
improve
the health of its
people
. It should ensure that all children are going to
school and
they have access to
good
food and potable water.
In conclusion
, while
arts
events
and
programmes
are
important
for the society, they should not
be sponsored
by the tax
money
contributed by
people
. The
government
should focus on more
important
areas and
use
its
money
for the benefit and
upliftment
of the human society.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes