Consumption of sugary products often leads to obesity. While some believe that the government has to play a crucial role in regulating their consumption, others often believe that it is the responsibility of an individual to be aware of a healthy nutrition. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail.
Firstly, usage of sugary drinks can be discouraged by imposing heavy taxes on them by governments. The addition of higher taxes on a product would increase its retail price and thereby cause a financial bottleneck to the customer. For example, taxing products like coca-cola, which is often treated to be the cause of obesity, would let customers to select drinks that are healthy. On the supporting side, government can provide additional subsidies for healthy choices, encouraging the customer to include them in their grocery shopping. For instance, subsiding foods like avocados would promote higher sales and thereby provide the consumer with a healthy alternative. Therefore, administration role is vital in regulating how sugary foods get to the users.
However, the responsibility of eating a healthy foods lie with the end customer. People opting for healthy foods are less prone to health problems. Moreover, reducing daily sugar intake has been one of the key factors of reduced cholesterol as per a recent study conducted by the FDA. To illustrate, diseases like diabetes, heart attack is reduced by the intake of healthy diet low in sugars. In addition to diet, active lifestyle promotes the positive body mass index and thereby reduces obesity. For instance, one who exercises regularly has optimal weight when compared to someone who doesn't. Hence, a healthy food recipe and active style promote overall well-being.
In conclusion, although the government has a role to play in restricting access to sugary foods, it is the equal responsibility of the consumer to make healthier choices.
Consumption of
sugary
products
often
leads to obesity. While
some
believe that the
government
has to
play a crucial role in regulating their consumption, others
often
believe that it is the responsibility of an individual to be aware of a
healthy
nutrition. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail.
Firstly
, usage of
sugary
drinks can
be discouraged
by imposing heavy taxes on them by
governments
. The addition of higher taxes on a product would increase its retail price and thereby cause a financial bottleneck to the
customer
.
For example
, taxing products like coca-cola, which is
often
treated to be the cause of obesity, would
let
customers
to select drinks that are
healthy
. On the supporting side,
government
can provide additional subsidies for
healthy
choices, encouraging the
customer
to include them in their grocery shopping.
For instance
, subsiding
foods
like avocados would promote higher sales and thereby provide the consumer with a
healthy
alternative.
Therefore
, administration role is vital in regulating how
sugary
foods
get
to the users.
However
, the responsibility of eating a
healthy
foods
lie with the
end
customer
.
People
opting for
healthy
foods
are less prone to health problems.
Moreover
, reducing daily sugar intake has been one of the key factors of
reduced
cholesterol as per a recent study conducted by the FDA. To illustrate, diseases like diabetes, heart attack is
reduced
by the intake of
healthy
diet low in sugars.
In addition
to diet, active lifestyle promotes the
positive
body mass index and thereby
reduces
obesity.
For instance
, one who exercises
regularly
has optimal weight when compared to someone who doesn't.
Hence
, a
healthy
food
recipe and active style promote
overall
well-being.
In conclusion
, although the
government
has a role to play in restricting access to
sugary
foods
, it is the equal responsibility of the consumer to
make
healthier choices.