In today' s modern world, communication plays a crucial role in every society. every day, individuals are in touch with different people including classmates, colleagues, managers, and so forth through different ways such as e-mail, letter, and face-to-face communication to name but a few. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among people about what is the best way of transferring information. Some people believe that modern technology pave the way for conveying knowledge, so individuals should make the most of technology to eliminate time consuming approaches such as meeting in person. other, however, advocate the idea that it is essential to communicate about an important project in person. I personally, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most important reasons.
To begin with, face-to face communication causes people to convey their opinion in the best way without any mistake. Sometimes, people cannot transmit their exact purposes through e-mail. using e-mail maybe cause disastrous mistakes in conveying information which takes a long time to revise them, as opposed to a situation when you can explain your meaning down to the small details in person. For example, I can recall when I was a civil engineering major. I mailed my supervisor and asked him a question about my dissertation. he responded me promptly but I could not found out his explanation. therefore, I decided to go to her office and ask my question in person. After he explained the concept to me, I figured out that I had misunderstood his purpose. Had I not went to see him and asked my question by face-to-face communication, I would have continued my thesis erroneously that its correction was very arduous.
Secondly, people can provide their colleagues with more information in person rather than through e-mail. Not only does face-to-face communication prevent from egregious mistakes, but it provide conveying a great deal of information as well. people often do not spend a lot of time to explain through their e-mail content because it is a boring and time consuming process and maybe informal. they describe key points and prevent giving extra information. therefore, it maybe need several e-mails to understand each other and solve the problem, while communicating in person could obviate need for other appointments. this clearly demonstrates that face-to-face appointments are much better than using technology to convey your meaning.
All in all, I really believe that individuals should use in person communications for their important projects on the ground that they can inhibit troubles and provide more details. Hence, should people allocate a time to face-to-face communication, they will produce a better work for their projects.
In
today&
#039; s modern world,
communication
plays a crucial role in every society.
every
day, individuals are in touch with
different
people
including classmates, colleagues, managers, and
so
forth
through
different
ways such as e-mail, letter, and face-to-face
communication
to name
but
a few. In this regard, there is a long-standing discussion among
people
about what is the best way of transferring
information
.
Some
people
believe that modern technology pave the way for conveying knowledge,
so
individuals should
make
the most of technology to eliminate
time consuming
approaches such as meeting in
person
.
other
,
however
, advocate the
idea
that it is essential to communicate about an
important
project in
person
. I
personally
, concur with the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most
important
reasons.
To
begin
with, face-to face
communication
causes
people
to convey their opinion in the best way without any mistake.
Sometimes
,
people
cannot transmit their exact purposes
through
e-mail.
using
e-mail maybe cause disastrous mistakes in conveying
information
which takes a long
time
to revise them, as opposed to a situation when you can
explain
your meaning down to the
small
details
in
person
.
For example
, I can recall when I was a civil engineering major. I mailed my supervisor and asked him a question about my dissertation.
he
responded me
promptly
but
I could not
found
out his explanation.
therefore
, I decided to go to her office and ask my question in
person
. After he
explained
the concept to me, I figured out that I had misunderstood his purpose. Had I not went to
see
him and asked my question by face-to-face
communication
, I would have continued my thesis
erroneously
that its correction was
very
arduous.
Secondly
,
people
can provide their colleagues with more
information
in
person
rather
than
through
e-mail. Not
only
does face-to-face
communication
prevent
from egregious mistakes,
but
it
provide
conveying a great deal of
information
as well
.
people
often
do not spend
a lot of
time
to
explain
through
their e-mail content
because
it is a boring and
time consuming
process and maybe informal.
they
describe
key points and
prevent
giving extra
information
.
therefore
, it maybe
need
several e-mails to understand each other and solve the problem, while communicating in
person
could obviate need for other appointments.
this
clearly
demonstrates that face-to-face appointments are much better than using technology to convey your meaning.
All in all, I
really
believe that individuals should
use
in
person
communications for their
important
projects on the ground that they can inhibit troubles and provide more
details
.
Hence
, should
people
allocate a
time
to face-to-face
communication
, they will produce a better work for their projects.