Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v.741
Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v. 741
How many of us, who are parent, has to deal with a tantrum of our children disapointed because we have to reject his or her demand for a new toy? Where is this desire coming from? Yes, television advertising, most frecuently. Thus, I strongly agree with the statement proposed above that states television advertising direc to young children should not be allowed. The reason is simple, advertising in young children provokes a strong desire of products that can not being satified by parents, provoking the disapointement and insatisfaction of both, children and parents.
First of all, the brain of a child is far from being mature at the age of two to five years old. Consecuently, the information received from advertising and propaganda is not processed in the correct way. Moreover, at that short age many kids assume that the exaggeration in the message, usually present in advertising, is accurate and actually real. For example, a company that wants to remark that is selling a biggest candy in the market can show the product as big as a person. An adult would understand that it is not true, but an exaggeration, but not a child.
Additionally, the inmmature mind of a child can distort his or her desire in an addiction. To illustrate this point, let' s review the last campains of Pokemon products. The company is the owner of a brand that constantly is updating characters and games, to keep the consumption of the products in a high level. Furthermore, if it is difficult, even for some adult to resist the temptation of buying more Pokemon' s products and games, much more would be for a little child. For this reason, I strongly suggest not to expose young children to advertising.
Finally, I think it is important for parents to understand who are behing the advertising. Usually, companies whose goal is increase their incomes. That is the real motive behind of a creative idea of an advertising, and not to take care of the children target of the massage. Thus, is not to blame who promote a brand, but who control these companies and regulate the advertising whose targets are children. In fact, I deeply belive that while this controls and regulations are not implemented, parents should not allow children to be exposed to advertising.
In conclusion, in review of all the reasons exposed above, I strongly sustain that television advertising direct toward young children should not be allowed. In fact, parent should also demand the goberment to implement stronger regulations regarding this issue.
How
many
of us,
who
are
parent
,
has to
deal with a tantrum of our
children
disapointed
because
we
have to
reject
his or her
demand for a new toy? Where is this desire coming from? Yes, television advertising, most
frecuently
.
Thus
, I
strongly
agree
with the statement proposed above that states television advertising
direc
to
young
children
should not be
allowed
. The reason is simple, advertising in
young
children
provokes a strong desire of
products
that can not being
satified
by
parents
, provoking the
disapointement
and
insatisfaction
of both,
children
and parents.
First of all
, the brain of a child is far from being mature at the age of two to five years
old
.
Consecuently
, the information received from advertising and propaganda is not processed in the correct way.
Moreover
, at that short age
many
kids assume that the exaggeration in the message,
usually
present in advertising, is accurate and actually real.
For example
, a
company
that wants to remark
that is
selling
a
biggest candy in the market can
show
the
product
as
big
as a person. An adult would understand that it is not true,
but
an exaggeration,
but
not a child.
Additionally
, the
inmmature
mind of a child can distort
his or her
desire in an addiction. To illustrate this point,
let&
#039; s review the last
campains
of
Pokemon
products
. The
company
is the owner of a brand that
constantly
is updating characters and games, to
keep
the consumption of the
products
in a high level.
Furthermore
, if it is difficult, even for
some
adult to resist the temptation of buying more
Pokemon&
#039; s
products
and games, much more would be for a
little
child.
For this reason
, I
strongly
suggest not to expose
young
children
to advertising.
Finally
, I
think
it is
important
for
parents
to understand
who
are
behing
the advertising.
Usually
,
companies
whose goal is increase their incomes.
That is
the real motive behind of a creative
idea
of an advertising, and not to take care of the
children
target of the
massage
.
Thus
, is not to blame
who
promote a brand,
but
who
control these
companies
and regulate the advertising whose targets are
children
. In fact, I
deeply
belive
that while
this
controls and regulations are not implemented,
parents
should not
allow
children
to
be exposed
to advertising.
In conclusion
, in review of all the reasons exposed above, I
strongly
sustain that television advertising direct toward
young
children
should not be
allowed
.
In
fact,
parent
should
also
demand the
goberment
to implement stronger regulations regarding this issue.
15Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
31Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
20Mistakes