Needless to say, in each society, there are some people obtaining more money than ordinary people. This brings up a highly controversial topic regarding the use of affluent subjects' income whether the wealthy people should donate their money to charity or not. I believe that the aforementioned individuals should devote their money to charity because poor people require money and also prosperous subjects do not spend money on serious topics, explained in the following paragraphs in great detail.
To begin with, the poor people need money. In other words, there are a lot of people around the world who have meager income or they may sometimes go to bed without eating food. If the individuals gaining a huge amount of money, contribute money for weak people, they will be financially rewarding. One example will suffice to illustrate my point. Last month, When I was talking with one of best friends, I saw a person who gave away his assets to poor people. This person donated money to people needing money for buying a house, getting married and so forth. I heard my friend that this person is an important person since he also helped to build educational centers such as schools for deprived children and young adults. His financial aids for my country is a very valuable task because his supports make it possible for some poor people to have a satisfactory life. Hence, prosperous subjects should dedicate their money and salary to charity, as the poor people require financial support.
The second point worth discussing is related to the use of money on trivial things. In fact, some wealthy subjects spend their monthly salary on unimportant things such as gambling, taking drugs and so on. Most of these practices are done by prosperous individuals for the sake of a craze, which I consider them a waste of money. One of my country' s famous person provides an illuminating insight into this fact. When I was watching a news program, I heard about one of celebrity on news program. This famous person was arrested at the party because of taking drugs. I had not known any idea about this famous person before I saw him on the television news program. The correspondent stated that the same person also has been captured when he was gambling, as it is a crime in my country. Dedicating money to these things caused him to be arrested. Nevertheless, if he devoted his money to better places such as donating money to fund university students, it would be advantageous. Not only would not he get arrested by police for his drug-related offenses, but the college students would benefit from his donation. Consequently, affluent subjects should be allocated to charity because they do not spend money on the worthwhile activities.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factor, I contend that the more money people acquire, the more money they should give away due to the need of weak people and because of spending affluent people on trivial things.
Needless to say, in each society, there are
some
people
obtaining more
money
than ordinary
people
. This brings up a
highly
controversial topic regarding the
use
of affluent
subjects&
#039; income whether the wealthy
people
should donate their
money
to
charity
or not. I believe that the aforementioned individuals should devote their
money
to
charity
because
poor
people
require
money
and
also
prosperous
subjects
do not spend
money
on serious topics,
explained
in the following paragraphs in great detail.
To
begin
with, the
poor
people
need
money
.
In other words
, there are
a lot of
people
around the world who have meager
income or
they may
sometimes
go to bed without eating food. If the individuals gaining a huge amount of
money
, contribute
money
for weak
people
, they will be
financially
rewarding. One example will suffice to illustrate my point. Last month, When I was talking with one of best friends, I
saw
a
person
who gave away his assets to
poor
people
. This
person
donated
money
to
people
needing
money
for buying a
house
, getting married and
so
forth. I heard my friend that this
person
is an
important
person
since he
also
helped
to build educational centers such as schools for deprived children and young adults. His financial aids for my country is a
very
valuable task
because
his supports
make
it possible for
some
poor
people
to have a satisfactory life.
Hence
, prosperous
subjects
should dedicate their
money
and salary to
charity
, as the
poor
people
require financial support.
The second point worth discussing
is related
to the
use
of
money
on trivial things. In fact,
some
wealthy
subjects
spend their monthly salary on unimportant things such as gambling, taking drugs and
so
on. Most of these practices
are done
by prosperous individuals for the sake of a craze, which I consider them a waste of
money
. One of my
country&
#039; s
famous
person
provides an illuminating insight into this fact. When I was watching a news program, I heard about one of celebrity on news program. This
famous
person
was arrested
at the party
because
of taking drugs. I had not known any
idea
about this
famous
person
before
I
saw
him on the television news program. The correspondent stated that the same
person
also
has
been captured
when he was gambling, as it is a crime in my country. Dedicating
money
to these things caused him to
be arrested
.
Nevertheless
, if he devoted his
money
to better places such as donating
money
to fund university students, it would be advantageous. Not
only
would not he
get
arrested by police for his drug-related offenses,
but
the college students would benefit from his donation.
Consequently
, affluent
subjects
should
be allocated
to
charity
because
they do not spend
money
on the worthwhile activities.
In conclusion
, according to above-mentioned factor, I contend that the more
money
people
acquire, the more
money
they should give away due to the need of weak
people
and
because
of spending affluent
people
on trivial things.