Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v.265
In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. v. 265
In recent times, raising the price of fuel has sparked great debates about whether it is the most effective approach for dealing with traffic and environmental problems or not. I believe that it is definitely not the most proper way; however, providing a good public transportation can better solve these problems.
To begin with, I disagree with increasing the expense of using car. A compelling reason for this is that this method does not reduce traffic congestion as well as does not abate any pollution since only the impoverished do not afford private transportation. In contrast, middle-class people are still willing to pay for this, while prosperous citizens even use more petrol. For example, a news once said that when Chinese government had arisen the fuel price, Chinese citizen still lived in the same way. Accordingly, this method is not the best way to deal with these problems, and thus, we require another method.
On the other hand, I feel that a good and affordable public transportation is the most effective solution. This is because, people in every social class wants to use public transportation, which is quick and cheap to avoid traffic. For instance, a latest study found that, in Bangkok, public sky train is 50% faster than a car. In addition, almost every modern public transportation used electricity, so it does not create any pollution. Therefore, it is no doubt that public transportation is a better way to solve traffic and pollution problems.
In conclusion, I think that increasing the price of petrol does not help with decreasing traffic and abating pollution since doing this only inhibit the use of private car of a certain group of people. On the contrary, giving effective and reliable electric public transportation is better at solving the problems.
In recent times, raising the price of fuel has sparked great debates about whether it is the most effective approach for dealing with
traffic
and environmental problems or not. I believe that it is definitely not the most proper way;
however
, providing a
good
public
transportation
can better solve these problems.
To
begin
with, I disagree with increasing the expense of using car. A compelling reason for this is that this method
does
not
reduce
traffic
congestion
as well
as
does
not abate any
pollution
since
only
the impoverished do not afford private
transportation
.
In contrast
, middle-
class
people
are
still
willing to pay for this, while prosperous citizens even
use
more petrol.
For example
, a news once said that when Chinese
government
had arisen the fuel price, Chinese citizen
still
lived
in the same way
.
Accordingly
, this method is not the best way to deal with these problems, and
thus
, we require another method.
On the other hand
, I feel that a
good
and affordable
public
transportation
is the most effective solution. This is
because
,
people
in every social
class
wants to
use
public
transportation
, which is quick and
cheap
to avoid
traffic
.
For instance
,
a
latest study found that, in Bangkok,
public
sky train is 50% faster than a car.
In addition
, almost every modern
public
transportation
used
electricity,
so
it
does
not create any
pollution
.
Therefore
, it is no doubt that
public
transportation
is a better way to solve
traffic
and
pollution
problems.
In conclusion
, I
think
that increasing the price of petrol
does
not
help
with decreasing
traffic
and abating
pollution
since doing this
only
inhibit the
use
of private car of a certain group of
people
.
On the contrary
, giving effective and reliable electric
public
transportation
is better at solving the problems.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes