One can safely assume that in every learning environment there is at least one student who is boisterous and has behavioural problems. Some people are of the opinion that they can have a negative impact on their colleagues. Putting them all together in a group is an effective way to create a conducive learning environment. However, apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord with it. The bases for my opinion are psychological and academic.
From a psychological viewpoint, it is widely spread that students who do not receive sufficient attention at home are more prone to the bad behavioural problem than those who do. As a result, they will use all means possible, namely behaving badly to obtain the much-needed attention from their teachers. Thus, grouping students with disruptive tendencies together is not the most appropriate solution as it will only make them feel more ostracised.
From an academic point of view, putting disobedient students in one class will only limit their educational opportunities and further discourage the students. It will be hard for the teachers to educate the students when they are all the disobedient and at the end of the day, nothing will get done.
It appears that combining the students, regardless of whether or not they're rebellious, will serve as a more effective solution. On the one hand, teachers will have an easier time controlling the student and figuring out what measures to take with each student. On the other hand, having a well-behaving and intelligent student in the class will serve as a role model for the disobedient students. Consequently, disobedient students will somehow feel compelled to emulate the role model and change for the better.
One can
safely
assume that in every learning environment there is at least one
student
who is boisterous and has
behavioural
problems.
Some
people
are of the opinion that they can have a
negative
impact on their colleagues. Putting them all together in a group is an effective way to create a conducive learning environment.
However
, apropos of the statement, I am in consummate discord with it. The bases for my opinion are psychological and academic.
From a psychological viewpoint, it is
widely
spread that
students
who do not receive sufficient attention at home are more prone to the
bad
behavioural
problem than those who do.
As a result
, they will
use
all means possible,
namely
behaving
badly
to obtain the much-needed attention from their teachers.
Thus
, grouping
students
with disruptive tendencies together is not the most appropriate solution as it will
only
make
them feel more
ostracised
.
From an academic point of view, putting disobedient
students
in one
class
will
only
limit their educational opportunities and
further
discourage the
students
. It will be
hard
for the teachers to educate the
students
when they are all the disobedient and at the
end
of the day, nothing will
get
done.
It appears that combining the
students
, regardless of
whether or not
they're rebellious, will serve as a more effective solution. On the one hand, teachers will have an easier time controlling the
student
and figuring out what measures to take with each
student
.
On the other hand
, having a well-behaving and intelligent
student
in the
class
will serve as a role model for the disobedient
students
.
Consequently
, disobedient
students
will somehow feel compelled to emulate the role model and
change
for the better.