It is irrefutable to say that permitting people to work even after retirement age may create some issues for organization However, some people firmly believe that it is always beneficial to have a senior employer in their staff but I strongly believe that it should not be the case. The following paragraph would shed light on my personal perspective along with an apt example.
On the one hand, elder employees have tons of experience. They are in this field for ages and they are capable of giving valuable inputs which help to tackle complicated issues in a short period of time. Beside this, they are the best teacher. Thus, they not only have academic know-how, but commercial experience too. Subsequently, they can contribute toward progression and betterment of the organization. To illustrate, a recent survey in India stated that, 90% senior employee are more loyal and committed towards company as compared to the younger generation working in the same firm.
On the other hand, technology is the new phenomenon and changing the way business around the globe. The golden generation is reluctant to adopt the changes and technologies. Furthermore, it is quite expensive to retain personnel who are at the top of the hierarchy ladder as most of these posts are occupied by older one as compared to hiring new campus pass-out. For example, in Reliance Industries, salary of VP is almost three times as compared to management trainee.
Last but not least, age will affect the quality of work. With age human memory get weak and due to some stress related problems they start to forget everything and thus eventually could not concentrate on work.
To recapitulate, older people should be respected and we should gain knowledge from their experiences, but I firmly believe that seniors should vacant post for the youth and should be given more opportunities. It will be more beneficial for society as well as for the nation. 
It is irrefutable to say that permitting  
people
 to work even after retirement  
age
 may create  
some
 issues for organization  
However
,  
some
  people
  firmly
 believe that it is always beneficial to have a senior employer in their staff  
but
 I  
strongly
 believe that it should not be the case. The following paragraph would shed light on my personal perspective along with an apt example.
On the one hand, elder employees have tons of experience. They are in this field for  
ages and
 they are capable of giving valuable inputs which  
help
 to tackle complicated issues in a short period of time. Beside this, they are the best teacher.  
Thus
, they not  
only
 have academic know-how,  
but
 commercial experience too.  
Subsequently
, they can contribute toward progression and betterment of the organization. To illustrate, a recent survey in India stated that, 90% senior employee are more loyal and committed towards  
company
 as compared to the younger generation working in the same firm. 
On the other hand
, technology is the new phenomenon and changing the way business around the globe. The golden generation is reluctant to adopt the  
changes
 and technologies.  
Furthermore
, it is quite expensive to retain personnel who are at the top of the hierarchy ladder as most of these posts  
are occupied
 by older one as compared to hiring new campus pass-out.  
For example
, in Reliance Industries, salary of VP is almost three times as compared to management trainee.
Last  
but
 not least,  
age
 will affect the quality of work. With  
age
 human memory  
get
 weak and due to  
some
  stress
 related problems they  
start
 to forget everything and  
thus
  eventually
 could not concentrate on work.
To recapitulate, older  
people
 should be  
respected and
 we should gain knowledge from their experiences,  
but
 I  
firmly
 believe that seniors should vacant post for the youth and should be  
given
 more opportunities. It will be more beneficial for society  
as well
 as for the nation.