It is argued that smoking in public places is presently prohibited in certain countries. A number of individuals say that such a rule is reasonable. This essay completely agrees with that statement because this action reduces the number of new smokers and less chances of getting infected by smokers.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to support my side is that the new smokers are less likely to smoke. This is to say that they are mostly teenagers and young adults and usually copy other smokers to show the maturity level, but by Banning public smoking, there are fewer chances to get in contact with them and this will help to not get addicted to smoking. A typical example of this is that according to survey in India, 60% reduction in the number of smokers after a ban in public areas.
The other reason to prove my point is that the numbers of passive smokers have been drastically reduced and this means that fewer people affected by smoking. If smokers do not smoke in public area, the people are not contaminated by the fumes of smoking, which has detrimental effects on our body and cause of dangerous diseases such as cancer, Asthma. A typical reference for this is that my uncle had passed away because of cancer, even he never smoked a cigarette in his life.
To conclude the essay, it can be finally commented that smoking in public zone is illegal in numerous countries and I personally believe that this rule of government far more valuable for all the citizens of the Nations because it reduces, the number of newcomers in smoking habits and the risk of getting affected by active smokers.
It
is argued
that
smoking
in
public
places is
presently
prohibited in certain countries. A
number
of individuals say that such a
rule
is reasonable. This essay completely
agrees
with that statement
because
this action
reduces
the
number
of new smokers and
less
chances of getting infected by smokers.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to support my side is that the new smokers are less likely to smoke. This is to say that they are
mostly
teenagers
and young adults and
usually
copy other smokers to
show
the maturity level,
but
by Banning
public
smoking
, there are fewer chances to
get
in contact with them and this will
help
to not
get
addicted to
smoking
. A typical example of this is that according to survey in India, 60% reduction in the
number
of smokers after a ban in
public
areas.
The other reason to prove my point is that the
numbers
of passive smokers have been
drastically
reduced
and this means that fewer
people
affected
by
smoking
. If smokers do not smoke in
public
area, the
people
are not contaminated by the fumes of
smoking
, which has detrimental effects on our body and cause of
dangerous
diseases such as cancer, Asthma. A typical reference for this is that my uncle had passed away
because
of cancer, even he never smoked a cigarette in his life.
To conclude
the essay, it can be
finally
commented that
smoking
in
public
zone is illegal in numerous countries and I
personally
believe that this
rule
of
government
far more valuable for all the citizens of the Nations
because
it
reduces
, the
number
of newcomers in
smoking
habits and the
risk
of getting
affected
by active smokers.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes