Although it is sometimes considered that the well-being of each person should be their concern, others think the administrations should be in charge of the nationals' dietary regimen. In my own view, I consider the fitness of a person is their personal obligation.
On the one hand, it is thought that since every individual who neglects their health will bear the effects of infirmity, then they should make their healthiness an utmost duty and I agree. In other words, if people fail to concentrate on taking proper meals and being healthy, then they will have to face the consequences of ill-health themselves. For example, a person who suffers from food poisoning, will feel the discomfort and also have to make financial sacrifices by settling hospital bills. Furthermore, when people take charge of their own well-being, they are more likely to be healthier and can become more productive. Besides, the well-being of people could be an indication of good governance and ensure better stability in the society.
On the other hand, other people believe the leaders of a country should be saddled with the task of ensuring all residents obtain perfect diets. Whereas every single person bears the discomfort of sickness, the government becomes negatively affected in the case of an epidemic. For instance, the outbreak of Ebola in some parts of Africa led to citizens fleeing their countries in fear of contracting the disease, thereby reducing manpower in such countries.
In conclusion, despite conflicting views on whose duty it is to ensure good health and balanced meals of people, I believe every entity should be responsible for their own fitness to avoid the negative constraints of unhealthiness.
Although it is
sometimes
considered that the well-being of each
person
should be their concern, others
think
the administrations should be in charge of the nationals' dietary regimen. In my
own
view, I consider the fitness of a
person
is their personal obligation.
On the one hand, it is
thought
that since every individual who neglects their health will bear the effects of infirmity, then they should
make
their healthiness an utmost duty and I
agree
. In
other
words, if
people
fail to concentrate on taking proper meals and being healthy, then they will
have to
face the consequences of ill-health themselves.
For example
, a
person
who suffers from food poisoning, will feel the discomfort and
also
have to
make
financial sacrifices by settling hospital bills.
Furthermore
, when
people
take charge of their
own
well-being, they are more likely to be healthier and can become more productive.
Besides
, the well-being of
people
could be an indication of
good
governance and ensure better stability in the society.
On the
other
hand,
other
people
believe the leaders of a country should
be saddled
with the task of ensuring all residents obtain perfect diets. Whereas every single
person
bears the discomfort of sickness, the
government
becomes
negatively
affected
in the case of an epidemic.
For instance
, the outbreak of Ebola in
some
parts of Africa led to citizens fleeing their countries in fear of contracting the disease, thereby reducing manpower in such countries.
In conclusion
, despite conflicting views on whose duty it is to ensure
good
health and balanced meals of
people
, I believe every entity should be responsible for their
own
fitness to avoid the
negative
constraints of unhealthiness.