In this contemporary era, idea and thoughts, which can be expressed through various means like writing, movies, paintings and many more, should have the liberty to be presented. However, understanding the sentiments of fellow beings is essential and hence government restrictions play a significant role. I am in partial accord with the above perspective that artists should be given radical freedom to showcase their views.
Throwing light on my view, I propound that that creativity has no bounds and only a free mind is capable of exploring the vast and unconventional horizons. Along with this outlook, we also follow the thought which accentuates that every individual has the right to express his or her views. We all must have experienced, at least once, that when our mind is under pressure or we feel the shackles around, the power of thinking dwindles, and the level of creativity mitigates. For example, women in Middle east countries can not put their views since there are numerous restrictions by higher authorities.
Propounding the compelling, though, which supports the restricts imposed by the official authorities, it is widely observed that some of creative outputs hurt the emotions of people. With that the victims might feel stifled under the burden of caste, religion or colour discrimination. I believe that inappropriate content, which is generally censored by the censor board, might hamper the thought process of teenagers. For example, Padmaavat, and Indian movie, many reckoned it to be denting the affluent legacy of Rajput’s. As a result, the alterations were made after the government penalization.
To summarise, I conclude that handling both the sides are difficult, consequently an appropriate balance is indispensable. Therefore, it is quite evident that limitation of regime constraint the flow of emotions, although it is for the well being of complete harmony. In a country with such a diversity, it is extremely sagacious to include such restrictions in our system.
In this contemporary era,
idea
and thoughts, which can
be expressed
through various means like writing, movies, paintings and
many
more, should have the liberty to
be presented
.
However
, understanding the sentiments of fellow beings is essential and
hence
government
restrictions play a significant role. I am in partial accord with the above perspective that artists should be
given
radical freedom to showcase their views.
Throwing light on my view, I propound that that creativity has no bounds and
only
a free mind is capable of exploring the vast and unconventional horizons. Along with this outlook, we
also
follow the
thought
which accentuates that every individual has the right to express
his or her
views. We all
must
have experienced, at least once, that when our mind is under
pressure or
we feel the shackles around, the power of thinking dwindles, and the level of creativity mitigates.
For example
, women in
Middle east
countries can not put their views since there are numerous restrictions by higher authorities.
Propounding the compelling, though, which supports the restricts imposed by the official authorities, it is
widely
observed that
some
of creative outputs hurt the emotions of
people
. With that the victims might feel stifled under the burden of caste, religion or
colour
discrimination. I believe that inappropriate content, which is
generally
censored by the censor board, might hamper the
thought
process of
teenagers
.
For example
,
Padmaavat
, and Indian movie,
many
reckoned it to be denting the affluent legacy of
Rajput
’s.
As a result
, the alterations
were made
after the
government
penalization.
To
summarise
, I conclude that handling both the sides are difficult,
consequently
an appropriate balance is indispensable.
Therefore
, it is quite evident that limitation of regime constraint the flow of emotions, although it is for the
well being
of complete harmony. In a country with such a diversity, it is
extremely
sagacious to include such restrictions in our system.