Art is the dignity and identity of any country and region. It represents the culture, the history and lifestyle of a nation. Peoples can be distinguished by their country’s art either it is music, painting or acting. According to some people, the government should provide funds to artists but the oppositions have an opinion that some other sources should take responsibility to support talented artists. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the view.
To begin with, we admire that artists are the representative of their region as they have precious God gifted ability, to sum up, their tradition and culture in painting or music. But every creative artist may not have enough financial resources to support his/her work and require funds from some strong sides.
Besides, art made it easy to be familiar with lifestyles and cultures of other regions and bring all nations close to each other. By having a review in past, it is clear that art was really fetching before centuries in comparison to present. Structures of historical building and paintings on their walls are still eye appealing and indicative of their constructors. The reason was that the empires and the government did not face issues like today such as the global warming, flood, unemployment etc. and they had sufficient funds to support their artists.
On the contrary, developing countries suffer from the lack of adequate budgets to ensure some very basic requirements of their people like health, education and better quality of life etc. Then again those countries don’t have a chance to spend much money to less important issues. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that individual artist and art institute will use the funds properly and positively.
Therefore, the government should avoid using their money in uncertain projects. In my opinion, the idea can be very useful to developed countries but for us, it might be extravagant.
Art
is the dignity and identity of any
country
and region. It represents the culture, the history and lifestyle of a nation. Peoples can
be distinguished
by their
country’s
art
either it is music, painting or acting. According to
some
people
, the
government
should provide funds to
artists
but
the oppositions have an opinion that
some
other sources should take responsibility to support talented
artists
. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the view.
To
begin
with, we admire that
artists
are the representative of their region as they have precious God gifted ability, to sum up, their tradition and culture in painting or music.
But
every creative
artist
may not have
enough
financial resources to support his/her work and require funds from
some
strong sides.
Besides
,
art
made it easy to be familiar with lifestyles and cultures of other regions and bring all nations close to each other. By having a review
in past
, it is
clear
that
art
was
really
fetching
before
centuries
in comparison
to present. Structures of historical building and paintings on their walls are
still
eye appealing and indicative of their constructors. The reason was that the empires and the
government
did not face issues like
today
such as the global warming, flood, unemployment etc. and they had sufficient funds to support their artists.
On the contrary
, developing
countries
suffer from the lack of adequate budgets to ensure
some
very
basic requirements of their
people
like health, education and better quality of life etc. Then again those
countries
don’t have a chance to spend much money to less
important
issues.
Furthermore
, there is no guarantee that individual
artist
and
art
institute will
use
the funds
properly
and
positively
.
Therefore
, the
government
should avoid using their money in uncertain projects. In my opinion, the
idea
can be
very
useful to developed
countries
but
for us, it might be extravagant.