It is considered that the private organizations should provide social and sports services to the local communities. In my opinion, while the local firms should contribute in it up to a certain level, the actual responsibility should be on the government.
On the one hand, the local companies should participate in providing sports and social services to the local community up to some extent. This is because the government is already facing enormous burden in managing and providing funds and arrangements for different sectors including social services and sports domain. For instance, in France, a recent survey showed that, the private owned companies in 2016 have contributed up to 15% in providing social and sports facilities for the local communities. Therefore companies should assist in social services such as medical facilities, housing, and sports to the local communities.
On the other hand, however, the ultimate responsibility of providing social and sports facilities lies on the governing body. State has the sufficient budget availability to spend in the different sectors pertaining to the local people. Which in turn are most likely to be run successfully, due to the involvement of the government. Another reason of state role is that, it collects taxes from the citizens for providing services. This means, the government is responsible for providing health, education, and sports facilities. In Pakistan, for example, the government collects an annual tax of 20 billion from the citizens for their welfare. Thus, this money should be spent on the local community, in the form of medical care, sports and housing arrangements.
In conclusion, it is believed that the local organizations ought to provide social and sports services. In my view, private companies should participate in such services up to some extent; however, eventually it is the government to deliver in making the availability of sports and social cares.
It
is considered
that the private organizations should provide
social
and
sports
services
to the
local
communities
. In my opinion, while the
local
firms should contribute in it up to a certain level, the actual responsibility should be on the
government
.
On the one hand, the
local
companies
should participate in providing
sports
and
social
services
to the
local
community
up to
some
extent. This is
because
the
government
is already facing enormous burden in managing and providing funds and arrangements for
different
sectors including
social
services
and
sports
domain.
For instance
, in France, a recent survey
showed
that, the private
owned
companies
in 2016 have contributed up to 15% in providing
social
and
sports
facilities for the
local
communities
.
Therefore
companies
should assist in
social
services
such as medical facilities, housing, and
sports
to the
local
communities.
On the other hand
,
however
, the ultimate responsibility of providing
social
and
sports
facilities lies on the governing body. State has the sufficient budget availability to spend in the
different
sectors pertaining to the
local
people
. Which in turn are most likely to
be run
successfully
, due to the involvement of the
government
. Another reason of state role is that, it collects taxes from the citizens for providing
services
. This means, the
government
is responsible for providing health, education, and
sports
facilities. In Pakistan,
for example
, the
government
collects an annual tax of 20 billion from the citizens for their welfare.
Thus
, this money should
be spent
on the
local
community
, in the form of medical care,
sports
and housing arrangements.
In conclusion
, it
is believed
that the
local
organizations ought to provide
social
and
sports
services
. In my view, private
companies
should participate in such
services
up to
some
extent;
however
,
eventually
it is the
government
to deliver in making the availability of
sports
and
social
cares.