Nurturing of children by parents in an environment of luxuries and adversities plays key role in dealing with the problems faced by them in adulthood. It is believed that those children who are raised in rich families are not well-equipped to deal with the adversity of grown up age compared to those who are raised in a poor family. It seems to me that I do agree with this statement because having pre-exposure to the problems faced by them during their teenage life can help them to survive in harsh difficulties of adult life and motivation of improving their social and economic status.
Firstly, these children are better equipped to deal with any kind of problem faced by them during their mature age. In their springtime, the environment which is around them teaching how to survive when you limited amount of penny. These can sacrifice their luxuries for essential items and are capable of surviving on low-income of their family. The struggle of their parents sets an excellent example of them to deal with the reality of life during their adult life.
Secondly, these are taught necessary skills, how to fulfil their goals when they have limited amount of resources. They started to earn by themselves and doesn’t rely on their parent’s income to fulfil their needs. For example, they started teaching children various subjects at their teenage age in order to earn their pocket money and contribute to their parent’s income. Children of poor family are highly motivated. They can set their high goals to improve their social and economic conditions. for example, Sunder Pichai, CEO of google. Although, he had a poor family background, but, despite of his talent and motivation, yet, he has become a highly paid CEO of the world.
To sum up, children with the impecunious family background are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life because of their pre-matured exposure and motivation.
Nurturing of
children
by
parents
in an environment of luxuries and adversities plays key role in dealing with the
problems
faced by them in adulthood. It
is believed
that those
children
who
are raised
in rich
families
are not well-equipped to
deal
with the adversity of grown up age compared to those who
are raised
in a poor
family
. It seems to me that I do
agree
with this statement
because
having
pre-exposure
to the
problems
faced by them during their teenage
life
can
help
them to survive in harsh difficulties of adult
life
and motivation of improving their social and economic status.
Firstly
, these
children
are better equipped to
deal
with any kind of
problem
faced by them during their mature age. In their springtime, the environment which is around them teaching how to survive when you limited amount of penny. These can sacrifice their luxuries for essential items and are capable of surviving on low-income of their
family
. The struggle of their
parents
sets an excellent example of them to
deal
with the reality of
life
during their adult life.
Secondly
, these
are taught
necessary
skills
, how to fulfil their goals when they have limited amount of resources. They
started
to earn by themselves and doesn’t rely on their
parent’s
income to fulfil their needs.
For example
, they
started
teaching
children
various subjects at their teenage age in order to earn their pocket money and contribute to their
parent’s
income.
Children
of poor
family
are
highly
motivated. They can set their high goals to
improve
their social and economic conditions.
for
example, Sunder
Pichai
, CEO of google. Although, he had a poor
family
background,
but
,
despite of
his talent and motivation,
yet
, he has become a
highly
paid CEO of the world.
To sum up,
children
with the impecunious
family
background are better prepared to
deal
with the
problems
of adult
life
because
of their
pre-matured
exposure and motivation.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
28Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes