The increasing pressure facing today’s teenagers has been a significant feature of modern society. While some people argue that they should concentrate on the subjects that they have a gift in, others hold that their efforts should be equally allocated to all the subjects. Generally, I tend to agree with the latter one.
It is true that teenagers who devote themselves to certain subjects seem to get more chances to achieve better academic performance and career success in the fields they are interested in. However, this is unwise based on the fact that they are less likely to have a clear insight into their career aspiration in an early age, hence resulting in undesirable consequences to their future career development.
Compared with teenagers who are restricted in terms of subjects, those who get access to a wide range of subjects are more likely to expand their outlooks and therefore realize their full potential. This is mainly because they tend to have a more objective perspective on what they are really passionate about. Moreover, focusing on all subjects allows for an all-round development of teenagers. For example, teenagers who have an edge in science course can improve their imagination and creativity by practicing art, which is essential to ensure their further achievement in the field of science. Furthermore, teenagers receiving general education are more likely to shape a positive personality and a sound attitude towards life. For instance, having access to psychology course helps them gain mental resilience which gives them an edge in overcoming challenges and coping with adversity.
To sum up, more encouragement should be given to the balance of curriculums as it plays vital roles in the personal growth of a teenager.
The increasing pressure facing
today
’s
teenagers
has been a significant feature of modern society. While
some
people
argue that they should concentrate on the
subjects
that they have a gift in, others hold that their efforts should be
equally
allocated to all the
subjects
.
Generally
, I tend to
agree
with the latter one.
It is true that
teenagers
who
devote themselves to certain
subjects
seem to
get
more chances to achieve better academic performance and career success in the fields they
are interested
in.
However
, this is unwise based on the fact that they are less likely to have a
clear
insight into their career aspiration in an early age,
hence
resulting in undesirable
consequences to
their future career development.
Compared with
teenagers
who
are restricted
in terms of
subjects
, those
who
get
access to a wide range of
subjects
are more likely to expand their outlooks and
therefore
realize their full potential. This is
mainly
because
they tend to have a more objective perspective on what they are
really
passionate about.
Moreover
, focusing on all
subjects
allows
for an all-round development of
teenagers
.
For example
,
teenagers
who
have an edge in science course can
improve
their imagination and creativity by practicing art, which is essential to ensure their
further
achievement in the field of science.
Furthermore
,
teenagers
receiving general education are more likely to shape a
positive
personality and a sound attitude towards life.
For instance
, having access to psychology course
helps
them gain mental resilience which gives them an edge in overcoming challenges and coping with adversity.
To sum up, more encouragement should be
given
to the balance of curriculums as it plays vital roles in the personal growth of a
teenager
.