Examinations are one of the most common methods of measuring learning in education systems throughout the world. At virtually every stage of the learning process, exams are used to verify that the learner is ready to move on to the next stage. However, many people believe that the role of examinations should be reconsidered.
There are clearly certain advantages to exams. They help to ensure fairness by imposing the same conditions on all exam candidates. They are also relatively versatile; different types of exam questions, for example, multiple-choice questions and essay tasks can test different sorts of reasoning ability. However, exams also have clear drawbacks. Test-wise candidates can often perform well on exams without having good underlying knowledge or skills. On the other hand, some test-takers perform poorly in exams simply because of anxiety. Some teachers and learners focus only on those aspects of the curriculum that are likely to be tested, thus narrowing the educational experience for all.
A number of measures should be taken to address these concerns. Wherever possible, exams should match the content and activities of the learning environment. Exam tasks should be varied to give fair opportunities to candidates with different types of skills. Other types of assessment should also be considered; assignment writing, for example, to assess independent learning and research skills, or group projects, to measure teamwork ability.
Exams clearly have a role to play in ensuring proper, objective assessment of achievement. However, exams need to be carefully designed and supplemented with other forms of assessment if they are to be a truly useful component of the educational system.
Examinations are one of the most common methods of measuring
learning
in education systems throughout the world. At
virtually
every stage of the
learning
process, exams are
used
to verify that the learner is ready to
move
on to the
next
stage.
However
,
many
people
believe that the role of examinations should
be reconsidered
.
There are
clearly
certain advantages to exams. They
help
to ensure fairness by imposing the same conditions on all exam candidates. They are
also
relatively
versatile;
different
types of exam questions,
for example
, multiple-choice questions and essay tasks can
test
different
sorts of reasoning ability.
However
, exams
also
have
clear
drawbacks.
Test
-wise candidates can
often
perform well on exams without having
good
underlying knowledge or
skills
.
On the other hand
,
some
test
-takers perform
poorly
in exams
simply
because
of anxiety.
Some
teachers and learners focus
only
on those aspects of the curriculum that are likely to be
tested
,
thus
narrowing the educational experience for all.
A number of measures should
be taken
to address these concerns. Wherever possible, exams should match the content and activities of the
learning
environment. Exam tasks should
be varied
to give
fair
opportunities to candidates with
different
types of
skills
. Other types of assessment should
also
be considered
; assignment writing,
for example
, to assess independent
learning
and research
skills
, or group projects, to measure teamwork ability.
Exams
clearly
have a role to play in ensuring proper, objective assessment of achievement.
However
, exams need to be
carefully
designed and supplemented with other forms of assessment if they are to be a
truly
useful component of the educational system.