There is no doubt these days the huge development of transport means leading to globalization problems. The question is, the total loss of cultural identity is caused by globalization or there are other reasons? In this essay, I am going to discuss both views and draw my own conclusion.
In terms of the negative side, some of the community believe that interaction with others will lead to forgetting of personal identity. The main reason given to support this claim is that many countries suffer from knowing what they are, they face an enormous number of culture. To illustrate, there are countless nations had this problem, like the USA, which mix of various societies. In other words, the reality of Americans is ambiguous that means the identity is missing. The improvement of transport or other facilities does not always mean good things.
However, on the other hand, people feel that the new ways to travel and get easier to new destinations will improve the global. Firstly, mixing with unknown people lead to an open mind and more. In other words, if a person travels from a closed community to more open societies that will result to change the brain to more ways of thinking. Secondly, travelers gain knowledge and learn without feeling that. This is because of the meeting and the adventure they face is acting like lessons. Also, the experience of being knowing new staff results from interaction with others. The ones who confront others can transfer what is his or her learning to the business and so on.
In conclusion, although some people want globalization to be reduced, others believe that exchange with the world is beneficial. Therefore I believe that both views are right but, the positive effect of globalization more than the negative side. 
There is no doubt these days the huge development of transport means leading to globalization problems. The question is, the total loss of cultural identity  
is caused
 by globalization or there are  
other
 reasons? In this essay, I am going to discuss both views and draw my  
own
 conclusion.
In terms of the  
negative
 side,  
some of the
 community believe that interaction with others will lead to forgetting of personal identity. The main reason  
given
 to support this claim is that  
many
 countries suffer from knowing what they are, they face an enormous number of culture. To illustrate, there are countless nations had this problem, like the USA, which mix of various societies. In  
other
 words, the reality of Americans is ambiguous that means the identity is missing. The improvement of transport or  
other
 facilities does not always mean  
good
 things. 
However
, on the  
other
 hand,  
people
 feel that the new ways to travel and  
get
 easier to new destinations will  
improve
 the global.  
Firstly
, mixing with unknown  
people
 lead to an open mind and more. In  
other
 words, if a person travels from a closed community to more open societies that will result to  
change
 the brain to more ways of thinking.  
Secondly
, travelers gain knowledge and learn without feeling that. This is  
because
 of the meeting and the adventure they face is acting like lessons.  
Also
, the experience of  
being knowing
 new staff results from interaction with others. The ones who confront others can transfer what is  
his or her
 learning to the business and  
so
 on. 
In conclusion
, although  
some
  people
 want globalization to be  
reduced
, others believe that exchange with the world is beneficial.  
Therefore
 I believe that both views are right  
but
, the  
positive
 effect of globalization more than the  
negative
 side.