Education and health care are two elements for the local citizens in societies and the charge to assess them varies in terms of local governments. Some people advocate that governments should be responsible for funding them completely; while, others insist that it is people's personal responsibility. The essay will discuss both views and presents my personal opinion as well.
To begin with, universal health care and education coverage will enhance the local residents' happiness for which they are more willing to contribute themselves to their nations. As a result, nations will become more powerful and competitive because of their strong and well-educated citizens. For example, Bhutan is one of small Asian countries with free access to these two services since its beginning for which it has become one of the countries with highest National Happiness Index and strongest military force. Free access to health care and education provide a harmonious environment for residents to grow and raise their families.
However, no charge of health care and education will also bring some drawbacks to the nations as well. The first one is that it might cause to abuse the services if residents and professionals who are in charge of the services do not follow strict guidelines. Therefore, universal services will lead to burdens for governments' budgets. In addiction, the efficiency of the health care system and motivation of education might be diminished. For instance, in Canada, universal health care service leads to longest waiting time for seeing specialists or operating.
In conclusion, free health care and education coverage will bring either benefits or drawbacks listed above. It definitely makes ordinary residents happy and less stressful by eliminating the financial burden of medical bills and education tuition. However, in order to maintain these two services's qualities, clients should have access to them properly or they will collapses and local citizens will suffer.
Education
and
health
care
are two elements for the
local
citizens in societies and the charge to assess them varies in terms of
local
governments
.
Some
people
advocate that
governments
should be responsible for funding them completely; while, others insist that it is
people
's personal responsibility. The essay will discuss both views and presents my personal opinion
as well
.
To
begin
with, universal
health
care
and
education
coverage will enhance the
local
residents' happiness for which they are more
willing to contribute themselves to their nations.
As a result
, nations will become more powerful and competitive
because
of their strong and well-educated citizens.
For example
, Bhutan is one of
small
Asian countries with free access to these two services since its beginning for which it has become one of the countries with
highest
National Happiness Index and strongest military force. Free access to
health
care
and
education
provide a harmonious environment for residents to grow and raise their families.
However
, no charge of
health
care
and
education
will
also
bring
some
drawbacks to the nations
as well
. The
first
one is that it might cause to abuse the services if residents and professionals who are in charge of the services do not follow strict guidelines.
Therefore
, universal services will lead to burdens for
governments
' budgets. In addiction, the efficiency of the
health
care
system and motivation of
education
might
be diminished
.
For instance
, in Canada, universal
health
care
service leads to
longest
waiting time for seeing specialists or operating.
In conclusion
, free
health
care
and
education
coverage will bring either benefits or drawbacks listed above. It definitely
makes
ordinary residents happy and less stressful by eliminating the financial burden of medical bills and
education
tuition.
However
, in order to maintain these two
services's
qualities, clients should have access to them
properly or
they will
collapses
and
local
citizens will suffer.