Art is the externalization of the skills of an artist. Therefore, there are the people who are in the favor to impart full liberty to the artists; however, others oppose this opinion freely. In my opinion, freedom is necessary up to greater extent but there should be proper surveillance on their work to avoid any unpleasant situation.
To begin with, there are many reasons why some people are in favor to give full freedom to artists. First of all, if they are free from any suppression that helps them to unveil all the social issues of the society without any fear. They expose the cancerous spot and request the society to uproot that. Any type of confinement will not let them to express their thoughts. Secondly, these creative artists are the nerve of every nation because of their extraordinary skills; if they work freely they, undoubtedly, have the potential to make masterpiece that brings recognition for every country in the map of world.
However, I feel that the full autonomy may have adverse effect on the individual and on the society because many times artists are seen painting any objectionable picture, adding any anti-social dialogue in the films that result in the communal riots and hurt sentiments of the people. These types of acts cost the life of the people. For example, once in the a popular film, some Hindu gods are shown begging. This film has not only brought criticism by the hindu society but also sparked communal riots that have ended up in the demise of some people. Therefore, they should not be given full freedom.
To sum up, although artists are required to give full liberty for exploring their creativity yet government should ensure that that very act may not hurt others feeling.
Art is the externalization of the
skills
of an
artist
.
Therefore
, there are the
people
who are in the favor to impart
full
liberty to the
artists
;
however
, others oppose this opinion
freely
. In my opinion, freedom is necessary up to greater extent
but
there should be proper surveillance on their work to avoid any unpleasant situation.
To
begin
with, there are
many
reasons why
some
people
are in favor to give
full
freedom to
artists
.
First of all
, if they are free from any suppression that
helps
them to unveil all the social issues of the
society
without any fear. They expose the cancerous spot and request the
society
to uproot that. Any type of confinement will not
let
them to express their thoughts.
Secondly
, these creative
artists
are the nerve of every nation
because
of their extraordinary
skills
; if they work
freely
they,
undoubtedly
, have the potential to
make
masterpiece that brings recognition for every country in the map of world.
However
, I feel that the
full
autonomy may have adverse effect on the individual and on the
society
because
many
times
artists
are
seen
painting any objectionable picture, adding any anti-social dialogue in the films that result in the communal riots and hurt sentiments of the
people
. These types of acts cost the life of the
people
.
For example
, once in
the a
popular film,
some
Hindu gods
are shown
begging. This film has not
only
brought criticism by the
hindu
society
but
also
sparked communal riots that have ended up in the demise of
some
people
.
Therefore
, they should not be
given
full
freedom.
To sum up, although
artists
are required
to give
full
liberty for exploring their creativity
yet
government
should ensure that that
very
act may not hurt others feeling.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes