Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.5

Artists requires freedom and liberty to enhance and advance their artistry. Many people assert that artists needs to have complete privilege to showcase any kinds of ideas that comes in their mind. In my opinion, artists should be given enough freedom to express their thoughts, ideas and emotions but total freedom is not required. People can't literally stop other people from formulating an opinion and being creative. Creativity of the artists are unlimited and the combinations can be generated throughout their existence as it is inborn nature of every artists. As long as no one is getting hurt from what they create and if their art is technically legal, artists should have permissive climate. Whether it is painting, sculpture or song, art can convey the message that the word cannot describe. It is the way of preserving and documenting one's culture and tradition, which gives people insights and various perspectives. Art is so powerful that it can evoke the emotions of the people and also comforts them. In a way it helps in human development. So, if the freedom of artists are restricted, it not only restrict their creativity but also impact the society as a whole. However, too much freedom can leads to souls decay. People often tends to misuse it if they were given complete freedom. Through art, some artists provokes the sentiment of other nations. For example, a teacher was beheaded in France by a Muslim student because that teacher showed the class funny cartoon image of prophet Muhammad. Likewise, many artists tends to hurt the religious sentiments and culture of other people. They does not care about the aftermath consequences that particular art may bring in the society. Despite all aforementioned cons of complete freedom for artists, they can have bigger impact on the lives of individual. It can change the life and opinion of people in a positive way. To conclude, it is not right to put artists in a cage, but giving them complete freedom is not right as well. Artists must allowed to create any kinds of work but that certain creation must not hurt other people sentimentally, religiously and culturally.
Artists requires
freedom
and liberty to enhance and advance their artistry.
Many
people
assert that
artists
needs to have
complete
privilege to showcase any kinds of
ideas
that
comes
in their mind. In my opinion,
artists
should be
given
enough
freedom
to express their thoughts,
ideas
and
emotions
but
total
freedom
is not required.

People
can't
literally
stop
other
people
from formulating an opinion and being creative. Creativity of the
artists
are unlimited
and the combinations can
be generated
throughout their existence as it is inborn nature of every
artists
. As long as no one is getting hurt from what they create and if their
art
is
technically
legal,
artists
should have permissive climate. Whether it is painting, sculpture or song,
art
can convey the message that the word cannot
describe
. It is the way of preserving and documenting one's culture and tradition, which gives
people
insights and various perspectives.
Art
is
so
powerful that it can evoke the emotions of the
people
and
also
comforts them. In a way it
helps
in human development.
So
, if the
freedom
of
artists
are restricted
, it not
only
restrict their creativity
but
also
impact the society as a whole.

However
, too much
freedom
can
leads
to souls decay.
People
often
tends to misuse it if they were
given
complete
freedom
. Through
art
,
some
artists
provokes the sentiment of
other
nations.
For example
, a teacher
was beheaded
in France by a Muslim student
because
that teacher
showed
the
class
funny
cartoon image of prophet Muhammad.
Likewise
,
many
artists
tends to hurt the religious sentiments and culture of
other
people
. They
does
not care about the aftermath consequences that particular
art
may bring in the society. Despite all aforementioned cons of
complete
freedom
for
artists
, they can have bigger impact on the
lives
of individual. It can
change
the life and opinion of
people
in a
positive
way.

To conclude
, it is not right to put
artists
in a cage,
but
giving them
complete
freedom
is not right
as well
.
Artists
must
allowed
to create any kinds of work
but
that certain creation
must
not hurt
other
people
sentimentally
,
religiously
and
culturally
.
What do you think?
  • FunnyFunny
  • LoveLove
  • WowWow
  • AngryAngry
  • SadSad
Show Comments
A special kind of beauty exists which is born in language, of language, and for language.
Gaston Bachelard

IELTS essay Artists need certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
358 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts