Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful. v.1
Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful. v. 1
Although some people suggest a results-orientation method to encourage students, others would propose improvements as a vital criterion to reward students. In my personal view, the latter is more useful.
On the one hand, it is thought that academic results should be considered as a means of encouragement by educators. Believing that rewards can foment competitions among students, schools should encourage those students having the best academic results in these competitions. For example, giving money to the most cited student in Google Scholar in a year is a fairly method of encouragement students competing for this position. Besides, academic results are specific and the explicit factors for evaluating the students. Therefore, not only do they allow schools to make a perfect decision in terms of encouragement, they but also give credibility to the process of rewarding.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that students should be rewarded based on their improvements. Courtesy of this method all students, apart from their God-given talents, have been motivated to study hard so that they can reach a sustainable improvement. As a result, all different students have an equal chance to be rewarded with regard to their improvements. In addition, by encouraging students based on their improvements, schools give students this opportunity to express a better version of themselves. Thus, whether they are awarded or not, all students break their previous records that could be one the most invaluable incentives in the student’s life helping them not to give up in the process of learning.
To conclude, although encouraging students based on their academic results could be effective, I am convinced that those students that show improvements are more eligible to be rewarded.
Although
some
people
suggest a results-orientation method to encourage
students
, others would propose
improvements
as a vital criterion to reward
students
. In my personal view, the latter is more useful.
On the one hand, it is
thought
that
academic
results
should
be considered
as a means of encouragement by educators. Believing that rewards can foment competitions among
students
, schools should encourage those
students
having the best
academic
results
in these competitions.
For example
, giving money to the most cited
student
in Google Scholar in a year is a
fairly method
of encouragement
students
competing for this position.
Besides
,
academic
results
are specific and the explicit factors for evaluating the
students
.
Therefore
, not
only
do they
allow
schools to
make
a perfect decision in terms of encouragement, they
but
also
give credibility to the process of rewarding.
On the other hand
, I side with those who believe that
students
should
be rewarded
based on their
improvements
. Courtesy of this method all
students
, apart from their God-
given
talents, have
been motivated
to study
hard
so
that they can reach a sustainable
improvement
. As a
result
, all
different
students
have an equal chance to
be rewarded
with regard to their
improvements
.
In addition
, by encouraging
students
based on their
improvements
, schools give
students
this opportunity to express a better version of themselves.
Thus
, whether they
are awarded
or not, all
students
break their previous records that could be
one
the most invaluable incentives in the
student’s
life helping them not to give up in the process of learning.
To conclude
, although encouraging
students
based on their
academic
results
could be effective, I
am convinced
that those
students
that
show
improvements
are more eligible to
be rewarded
.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
31Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes