Offering rewards to good scorers is one of incentive programs which schools often launch after examination to motivate students. However, there is a suggestion that moderate achievers are worth being encouraged for their own endeavor, instead of STRAIGHT A STUDENTS. From my point of view, young learners, in any circumstance, should be deserved well as long as they are improving little by little.
The first reason is that this may cause mental illness to lower achievers, if their EFFORTS ARE UNAPPRECIATED. For example, a student is likely to suffer from negative mood such as FEELING INFERIOR or envious when he realizes that no matter how he attempts, he is just like a RUNNER-UP IN TOURNAMENTS. Therefore, it is necessary to pay compliments as well as monetary rewards to students even though their achievements are junior. Not only will this inspire learners to be more creative in their studies, but also it creates equity in schools where each personal value needs acknowledging.
On the other hand, without incentive grants for high-scorers, they would lack motivation to step further as a foreseen outcome. In the long run, this may lead to BRAIN DRAIN referring to the emigration of intellectuals to other nations for better study environment. Apart from these, praising high-scorers is the positive way to SET SHINING EXAMPLES for weaker students, which NURTURES HEALTHY COMPETITION in today schools. As a result, unless they do their best, they would find it hard to keep up with their peers.
In conclusion, I contend that any personal improvement, if modest, should be appreciated. More importantly, giving rewards needs to be due and well-prepared in order that each receiver realizes they should move forward, rather than being satisfied with achievements recorded.
Offering rewards to
good
scorers is one of incentive programs which schools
often
launch after examination to motivate
students
.
However
, there is a suggestion that moderate achievers are worth
being encouraged
for their
own
endeavor,
instead
of STRAIGHT A
STUDENTS
. From my point of view, young learners, in any circumstance, should
be deserved
well as long as they are improving
little
by
little
.
The
first
reason is that this may cause mental illness to lower achievers, if their EFFORTS
ARE UNAPPRECIATED
.
For example
, a
student
is likely to suffer from
negative
mood such as FEELING INFERIOR or envious when he realizes that no matter how he attempts, he is
just
like a RUNNER-UP IN TOURNAMENTS.
Therefore
, it is necessary to pay compliments
as well
as monetary rewards to
students
even though
their achievements are junior. Not
only
will this inspire learners to be more creative in their studies,
but
also
it creates equity in schools where each personal value needs acknowledging.
On the other hand
, without incentive grants for high-scorers, they would lack motivation to step
further
as a foreseen outcome. In the long run, this may lead to BRAIN DRAIN referring to the emigration of intellectuals to other nations for better study environment. Apart from these, praising high-scorers is the
positive
way to SET SHINING EXAMPLES for weaker
students
, which NURTURES HEALTHY COMPETITION in
today
schools.
As a result
, unless they do their best, they would find it
hard
to
keep
up with their peers.
In conclusion
, I contend that any personal improvement, if modest, should
be appreciated
. More
importantly
, giving rewards needs to be due and well-prepared in order that each receiver realizes they should
move
forward,
rather
than
being satisfied
with achievements recorded.