It is argued that using renewable potential for industry and consumerism is not cheap and even quite challenging to substitute fossil fuel like gas, oil, . . While I accept that this change has several obstacles, I also believe it could be create a dramatic breakthrough in the industry of capacity.
On the one hand, alternative capacity resources could cause some drawbacks. Firstly, the process of applying these, capacity capacity is likely to be unpractical in some parts of the world. For example, solar capacity can't work at night as well as couldn't be used in cold climate areas where the sunlight is pretty rare. In addition, not every country has a coastline, river or windy hills which are geographical requirements for creating the alternatives. Secondly, this change also entail expensive research and development. The government budget, which comes from tax revenues could be allocated for more fields. This means the expenditure for spreading renewable capacity out is limited and might be not enough to complete the process. By contrast, if it receives more money, the spending for others like education and medicine might be cut down considerably.
On the other hand, I believe the discovery of the alternatives can be seen as a great thing in the context of lacking of fossil fuel. People don't need to be worried about dwindling supplies of progressively more expensive resources. Solar capacity, for instance, would never run out. It creates free electricity, although their initial cost must be paid off. More than that, these sources can help to mitigate the toxic emissions released into the air. Because the manufacturing process no longer produces CO2, N2, . . Which can be harmful to the environment. That lead to no further air pollution or any risks of environmental contamination.
In a nutshell, for these reasons mentioned above, I would argue that alternative energy sources are both beneficial and detrimental.
It
is argued
that using renewable potential for industry and consumerism is not
cheap
and even quite challenging
to substitute
fossil fuel like gas, oil
, .
.
While I accept that this
change
has several obstacles, I
also
believe it could be
create
a dramatic breakthrough in the industry of capacity.
On the one hand,
alternative
capacity
resources could cause
some
drawbacks.
Firstly
, the process of applying these,
capacity
capacity
is likely to be unpractical in
some
parts of the world.
For example
, solar
capacity
can't work at night
as well
as couldn't be
used
in
cold
climate areas where the sunlight is pretty rare.
In addition
, not every country has a coastline, river or windy hills which are geographical requirements for creating the
alternatives
.
Secondly
, this
change
also
entail expensive research and development. The
government
budget, which
comes
from tax revenues could
be allocated
for more fields. This means the expenditure for spreading renewable
capacity
out
is limited
and might be not
enough
to complete the process. By contrast, if it receives more money, the spending for others like education and medicine might be
cut
down
considerably
.
On the other hand
, I believe the discovery of the
alternatives
can be
seen
as a great thing in the context of lacking of fossil fuel.
People
don't need to
be worried
about dwindling supplies of
progressively
more expensive resources. Solar
capacity
,
for instance
, would never run out. It creates free electricity, although their initial cost
must
be paid
off. More than that, these sources can
help
to mitigate the toxic emissions released into the air.
Because
the manufacturing process no longer produces CO2, N2
, .
.
Which
can be harmful to the environment. That lead to no
further
air pollution or any
risks
of environmental contamination.
In a nutshell, for these reasons mentioned above, I would argue that
alternative
energy sources are both beneficial and detrimental.