Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree? v.10

All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. v. 10
In today’s continuously emerging era, it is highly recommended to reduce usage, by cars, of fossil fuels and should be replaced by electronic ones. I strongly agree with the statement as electric cars produce near-zero air pollution and cost-effective. Since the invention of cars, the air pollution index has always shown an increment over the years. It is the main factor in uplifting global warming effects dramatically in the last few couples of the decade. People, around the world, are facing problems, such as breathing problems, lung issues and in some cases cancer also. More on that, the smoke produced by such cars is causing eye problems as well. The burning sensation is one which, faced with seven among every ten humans. According to a recent study by one of the top most research institutes in the State of America, the smoke produced by cars is as dangerous as inhaling directly by smoking cigarettes. In addition to that, Electricity production is more cost-effective rather than producing fossil fuels with a hefty amount. There are many natural resources available free of cost, like wind energy, solar energy, hydropower energy, by which electricity can be produced with very less infrastructure than needed by refineries. In other words, hybrid or electric cars are more economical and efficient in their performance compared to gas-driven cars. Therefore, it is safe to say that replacing traditional cars with electric ones is a welcoming thought. For example, Electric cars produced by Mitsubishi have a high average and run on energy driven from solar panels. Thus, to conclude, Electric cars have a positive effect on the globe with respect to the environment and finance to bring a good attitude within society. I strongly believe there is no loss to use electric cars.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
’s
continuously
emerging era, it is
highly
recommended to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
usage, by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, of fossil fuels and should
be replaced
by electronic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
. I
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the statement as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
produce near-zero air pollution and cost-effective.

Since the invention of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
, the air pollution index has always shown an increment over the years. It is the main factor in uplifting global warming effects
dramatically
in the last few couples of the decade.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
, around the world, are facing problems, such as breathing problems, lung issues and in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "cases'" or "case's"?
cases
cancer
also
. More on that, the smoke
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
by such
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is causing eye problems
as well
. The burning sensation is one which, faced with seven among every ten humans. According to a recent study by one of the top most research institutes in the State of America, the smoke
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
is as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
as inhaling
directly
by smoking cigarettes.

In addition
to that, Electricity production is more cost-effective
rather
than producing fossil fuels with a hefty amount. There are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
natural resources available free of cost, like wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, hydropower
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, by which electricity can be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
less infrastructure than needed by refineries.
In other words
, hybrid or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are more economical and efficient in their performance compared to gas-driven
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
Therefore
, it is safe to say that replacing traditional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
is a welcoming
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
by Mitsubishi have a high average and run on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
driven from solar panels.

Thus
,
to conclude
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
have a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
effect on the globe with respect to the environment and finance to bring a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
attitude within society. I
strongly
believe there is no loss to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
electric
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. v. 10

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
294 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts