In this contemporary era, air transportation facilities should be prohibited due to contamination and exhaustion of global fuel. I totally disagree with the laid statement. Air travel is time efficient as well as flexible transportation. My ideas and opinion are justified further.
Firstly, air travels provide luxurious services and best flights with comfortable arrangements. Moreover, this transport system has always run on air, so it totally eliminates the fear of not only water pollution but also soil contaminating. Secondly, it is advantageous to the natural resources like trees, plants, mountain and many more due to its abilities of flying high in the deep sky. By usage of enormous air travel, which in turn results to retain non renewable sources like petrol, diesel. For example, a recent survey by a popular newspaper 'Times of India' has conveyed that aeroplanes is more environment friendly as compared to other transportation services.
In addition, air agencies are the only mode of traveling which help people to migrate from one place to another. Moreover, if the restrictions given to the air companies then, there will be relation breakups between the countries which trade all items over the universe. In addition, air services play a critical role in a developing native land, as it is useful for them to import and export things in a rapid amount of time. Air travels uses kerosene as a fuel and kerosene quantity is immense compared to other fuels. However, we cannot overlook the other side too. The fumes which are released by plane mixes with air and as a consequence it produces air pollution. By this reason, air tourism should not be restricted in this present century.
In conclusion, it is interesting to say that air travel is better for sustaining non renewable sources and it is time efficient. It plays a substantive role in import export business. Furthermore, it uses less fuel of the globe. Due to this, I completely disagree with the given statement.
In this contemporary era,
air
transportation facilities should
be prohibited
due to contamination and exhaustion of global
fuel
. I
totally
disagree with the laid statement.
Air
travel
is time efficient
as well
as flexible transportation. My
ideas
and opinion
are justified
further
.
Firstly
,
air
travels
provide luxurious services and best flights with comfortable arrangements.
Moreover
, this transport system has always run on
air
,
so
it
totally
eliminates the fear of not
only
water pollution
but
also
soil contaminating.
Secondly
, it is advantageous to the natural resources like trees, plants, mountain and
many
more due to its abilities of flying high in the deep sky. By usage of enormous
air
travel
, which in turn results to retain
non renewable
sources like petrol, diesel.
For example
, a recent survey by a popular newspaper 'Times of India' has conveyed that
aeroplanes
is more environment friendly as compared to other transportation services.
In addition
,
air
agencies are the
only
mode of traveling which
help
people
to migrate from one place to another.
Moreover
, if the restrictions
given
to the
air
companies
then, there will be relation breakups between the countries which trade all items over the universe.
In addition
,
air
services play a critical role in a developing native land, as it is useful for them to import and export things in a rapid amount of time.
Air
travels
uses
kerosene as a
fuel
and kerosene quantity is immense compared to other
fuels
.
However
, we cannot overlook the other side too. The fumes which
are released
by
plane
mixes with
air
and as a consequence it produces
air
pollution. By this reason,
air
tourism should not
be restricted
in this present century.
In conclusion
, it is interesting to say that
air
travel
is better for sustaining
non renewable
sources and it is time efficient. It plays a substantive role in import export business.
Furthermore
, it
uses
less
fuel
of the globe. Due to this, I completely disagree with the
given
statement.