One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether to use standardised penalties or flexible ones. This essay examines this question from both points of view and then I will give my own perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument there are people who argue that the benefits of standardised punishments considerably outweigh its disadvantages. The main reason for believing this is that it is more efficient and cheaper to manage. One good illustration of this is parking tickets. If every one of these had to go to court and be ruled upon by a judge and jury this would be very expensive and waste a lot of people’s time. It is also possible to say that this system is fairer because every person is treated the same regardless of race or gender.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that in fact it is better to consider the situation and reasons of a crime. People often have this opinion because sometimes people are forced to commit a crime such as murder due to reasons like self-defence. Clearly, this should be considered in sentencing for the crime. A second point is that the reason for a crime should be taken into account. A particularly good example here is that someone who steals food to feed their family shouldn’t be punished as someone who steals a watch because they want to look wealthy.
In conclusion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that it is better to decide the penalty on a case-by-case basis, as getting the right decision is more important than the justice system saving money.
One of the
highly
controversial issues
today
relates to whether to
use
standardised
penalties or flexible ones. This essay examines this question from both points of view and then I will give my
own
perspective on the matter.
On one side of the argument there are
people
who argue that the benefits of
standardised
punishments
considerably
outweigh its disadvantages. The main
reason
for believing this is that it is more efficient and cheaper to manage. One
good
illustration of this is parking tickets. If every one of these had to go to court and
be ruled
upon by a judge and jury this would be
very
expensive and waste
a lot of
people’s
time. It is
also
possible to say that this system is fairer
because
every person
is treated
the same regardless of race or gender.
On the other hand
, it is
also
possible to
make
the opposing case. It is
often
argued that in fact it is better to consider the situation and
reasons
of a
crime
.
People
often
have this opinion
because
sometimes
people
are forced
to commit a
crime
such as murder due to
reasons
like
self-defence
.
Clearly
, this should
be considered
in sentencing for the
crime
. A second point is that the
reason
for a
crime
should
be taken
into account. A
particularly
good
example here is that someone who steals food to feed their family shouldn’t
be punished
as someone who steals a
watch
because
they want to look wealthy.
In conclusion
, both arguments have their merits. On balance,
however
, I tend to believe that it is better to decide the penalty on a case-by-case basis, as getting the right decision is more
important
than the justice system saving money.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes