In this present world, the usage of technology is constantly on the rise. Even classrooms are among the many places that enjoy the usage and benefits of automation. It is disagreed that classroom teachers will be totally substituted for technology. Analysing the incapability of disciplining classroom students with technology, as well as the limitation in the learning process of students taught with technology will prove this.
Firstly, a robotic teacher made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its classroom students. For instance, it is widely known that kids need to be thoroughly watched by their teachers to be sure that they take their class works seriously and do not fool around when classes are going on. Sadly, this is a task robotic teachers will be incapable of carrying out. Therefore, this makes it clear that classroom teachers will never be totally substituted for technology.
Secondly, the learning process of students would be disrupted if they are taught by robotic teachers, which may slow down some students’ ability to comprehend information taught in lessons. For example, kids love to be motivated before lessons are taught effectively. This is a quality that many human teachers have but robotic teachers do not have. Thus it becomes apparent that human teachers will never be replaced with robotic teachers in a classroom.
To summarise, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for automation.
In this present world, the usage of
technology
is
constantly
on the rise. Even classrooms are among the
many
places that enjoy the usage and benefits of automation. It
is disagreed
that classroom
teachers
will be
totally
substituted for
technology
.
Analysing
the incapability of disciplining classroom
students
with
technology
,
as well
as the limitation in the learning process of
students
taught with
technology
will prove this.
Firstly
, a
robotic
teacher
made with artificial intelligence would lack sufficient control over its classroom
students
.
For instance
, it is
widely
known that kids need to be
thoroughly
watched
by their
teachers
to be sure that they take their
class
works
seriously
and do not fool around when classes are going on.
Sadly
, this is a task
robotic
teachers
will be incapable of carrying out.
Therefore
, this
makes
it
clear
that classroom
teachers
will never be
totally
substituted for technology.
Secondly
, the learning process of
students
would
be disrupted
if they
are taught
by
robotic
teachers
, which may slow down
some
students’
ability to comprehend information taught in lessons.
For example
, kids
love
to
be motivated
before
lessons
are taught
effectively
. This is a quality that
many
human
teachers
have
but
robotic
teachers
do not have.
Thus
it becomes apparent that human
teachers
will never
be replaced
with
robotic
teachers
in a classroom.
To
summarise
, a
robotic
teacher
does not have the necessary disciple to
properly
give instructions to
students
and actually works to retard the ability of a
student
to comprehend new lessons.
Therefore
, it is
clear
that the
idea
of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot
be supported
. After thorough analysis on this subject, it
is predicted
that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the
positive
effects, and
because of this
, classroom
teachers
will never
be substituted
for automation.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes