Methods to address traffic jams is a contentious topic for many people. While some people think that government funds should be poured in constructing more railways and subway lines, I believe that widening streets would reduce the vehicle density. The debate over this topic seems to consist of two irreconcilable poles. My essay will discuss these opposite camps before my opinion is given.
It is true that government should invest money in a road extension in order to alleviate the volume of traffic. The reason here is that citizens would have more spacious roads to commute every day between workplace and home with the absence of congested lanes. Therefore, the prospect of bumper-to-bumper traffic may be immediately tackled thanks to this investment. However, I believe that the extension and construction of roads would bring about certain problems. Widening the streets would directly lead to the deficit of the national budget, not only for infrastructure construction, but also for the charge of household migration to other areas. This even evokes people to use private transport which is the culprit of clogged traffic flows.
It is within the realm of possibility that building trains and subway lines may accelerate more people to commute by public vehicles. By this way, the number of private vehicles is likely to be reduced and traffic would flow smoothly. For example, Japan saw a significant decrease in the density of vehicles after building underground tunnels and it has happened for years. Therefore, this essay believes that constructing more railways and subway lines are more beneficial for the national budget.
In conclusion, people have different views about avoiding severe traffic congestion problems. Although some people think that road extensions is a good solution, I believe that building train and subway lines are more feasible because this measure would minimize the number of people commuting by their own vehicles.
Methods to address
traffic
jams is a contentious topic for
many
people
. While
some
people
think
that
government
funds should
be poured
in constructing more railways and
subway
lines
, I
believe
that widening streets would
reduce
the
vehicle
density. The debate over this topic seems to consist of two irreconcilable poles. My essay will discuss these opposite camps
before
my opinion is
given
.
It is true that
government
should invest money in a
road
extension in order to alleviate the volume of
traffic
. The reason
here is that citizens
would have more spacious
roads
to commute every day between workplace and home with the absence of congested lanes.
Therefore
, the prospect of bumper-to-bumper
traffic
may be immediately tackled thanks to this investment.
However
, I
believe
that the extension and construction of
roads
would bring about certain problems. Widening the streets would
directly
lead to the deficit of the national budget, not
only
for infrastructure construction,
but
also
for the charge of household migration to other areas. This even evokes
people
to
use
private transport which is the culprit of clogged
traffic
flows.
It is within the realm of possibility that building trains and
subway
lines
may accelerate more
people
to commute by public
vehicles
. By this way, the number of private
vehicles
is likely to be
reduced
and
traffic
would flow
smoothly
.
For example
, Japan
saw
a significant decrease in the density of
vehicles
after building underground tunnels and it has happened for years.
Therefore
, this essay
believes
that constructing more railways and
subway
lines
are more beneficial for the national budget.
In conclusion
,
people
have
different
views about avoiding severe
traffic
congestion problems. Although
some
people
think
that
road
extensions is a
good
solution, I
believe
that building train and
subway
lines
are more feasible
because
this measure would minimize the number of
people
commuting by their
own
vehicles
.