In modern times, the issue of keeping the savage animal in zoos has become highly controversial. It is frequently said that zoos are not an ideal place for the wild beast, however, others say that this should be kept in zoos for several reasons. In this easy, I will discuss both sides of this contentious argument and provide my own perspective.
Generally speaking, there a wide range of reasons why people compel that animals should not be kept in zoos. Perhaps the main reasons why people are in favour of this idea is that animals have the right to dwell their natural habitats because it will make their lives happier and easier. For example, if animals live in the forest, they will freely roam around and experience different seasons as well as being around other animals. In addition, they are kept alone in a cage which can make them feel isolated. This can lead to the death of the animal and suppress their natural instinct of praying.
Despite this argument, there are more convincing arguments about why zoos are important. The primary reason is the change of the natural habitats when people artificially transform the environment, they destroy the vegetation and animal's natural habitats. As a result, many species are being endangered. So, zoos are the only safest territory to protect the threatened animals. Secondly, zoos can serve as a spectacle of human beings to see many different kinds of wild species such as birds, lions, tigers, mammals, fishes, et cetera all in one place. As a consequence, people may gain immense knowledge of wildlife by observing them closely.
In conclusion, this is a topic that raises strong passions on both sides of the argument. Having both sides of the viewpoints I argue that wild animals should not be held in zoos; they should enjoy their natural habitats. If we want to protect animals from poaching, we can create some wild environments rather than zoos.
In modern times, the issue of keeping the savage
animal
in zoos has become
highly
controversial. It is
frequently
said that zoos are not an ideal place for the wild beast,
however
, others say that this should be
kept
in zoos for several
reasons
. In this easy, I will discuss both sides of this contentious
argument
and provide my
own
perspective.
Generally
speaking, there a wide range of
reasons
why
people
compel that
animals
should not be
kept
in zoos. Perhaps the main
reasons
why
people
are in
favour
of this
idea
is that
animals
have the right to dwell their
natural
habitats
because
it will
make
their
lives
happier and easier.
For example
, if
animals
live
in the forest, they will
freely
roam around and experience
different
seasons
as well
as being around other
animals
.
In addition
, they are
kept
alone in a cage which can
make
them feel isolated. This can lead to the death of the
animal
and suppress their
natural
instinct of praying.
Despite this
argument
, there are more convincing
arguments
about why zoos are
important
. The primary
reason
is the
change
of the
natural
habitats when
people
artificially
transform the environment, they
destroy
the vegetation and animal's
natural
habitats.
As a result
,
many
species are
being endangered
.
So
, zoos are the
only
safest territory to protect the threatened
animals
.
Secondly
, zoos can serve as a spectacle of human beings to
see
many
different
kinds of wild species such as birds, lions, tigers, mammals, fishes,
et cetera
all in one place. As a consequence,
people
may gain immense knowledge of wildlife by observing them
closely
.
In conclusion
, this is a topic that raises strong passions on both sides of the
argument
. Having both sides of the viewpoints I argue that wild
animals
should not
be held
in zoos; they should enjoy their
natural
habitats. If we want to protect
animals
from poaching, we can create
some
wild environments
rather
than zoos.